On the heels of the unscientific poll taken by Chris Truscott, I decided to reveal the results of my own unscientific poll. With only 29 respondents, the poll has a margin of error of, well, a lot!
Here is the political breakdown of those people taking the poll:



Here are some of the unedited comments from the poll:
I can not support Al Franken because of his attacks on women in the concealed as "satire".
Though I wouldn't be happy about it, I'd be more inclined to vote for Franken. If there were a 3rd party candidate, I'd vote for them over either of these two.
I am a member of NETWORK, a Catholic Social Justice Lobby, and Coleman's voting record is 65% of the time with NETWORK issues. A much better record than many Democratic congress people.
If Mike was as lackluster in the general as he was in the endorsement race, we'd be losing this one with a capital L. BAD IDEA.
At this point, I am in agreement with Truscott that Ciresi will not be jumping back into this race. Furthermore, I don't believe that it would be at all helpful to our chances of winning this seat. As I have said before, a draft Ciresi movement would have been appropriate for the state endorsing convention but now would just further divide the party. As much as I like Ciresi and wish that he were the DFL choice to take on Coleman, it is too late for that. While I have been advised by some very smart friends to get behind Al Franken, I still haven't reached that point but time will tell.