Showing posts with label Dan Severson. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Dan Severson. Show all posts
I caught this little piece of 2010 election news in my google reader today:

Severson ponders secretary of state bid

SAUK RAPIDS — Rep. Dan Severson of Sauk Rapids has filed the paperwork to explore a run for secretary of state.

Severson would be seeking the Republican nomination to challenge DFLer Mark Ritchie, who was elected in 2006.


While I hate to pile on this early, it seemed like a good time to take a little stroll down Dan Severson memory lane. What have I learned about Representative Severson in the past year and a half?
To top it off, there are the numerous reports that come to me from unrelated sources indicating that Severson is really just the face and his wife truly wields all the power from behind the scenes. So, we have a guy who appears to hate Mexican Americans, Arab Americans, and homosexuals and we are supposed to entrust him to keeping elections fair and ensuring that ALL Minnesotans have the right and opportunity to cast a vote? I don't think so...

Learn more about Severson and stop back from time to time as 2010 elections near...
While I applaud the effort to keep children safe from predator's that lurk on the internet, it seems like an unworkable proposition to make it illegal for them to access social networking sites. Such is the case with House File 130 being co-authored by Representative Severson (R).

How does one effectively police this type of situation? The only way someone is found to be an online sexual predator is typically after the damage has been done. If your goal is keeping children safe, we need to find ways to stop the initial predatory act.

After this point, how many resources will it take to police their internet usage and online memberships? How much liability is there on the part of these sites to keep predator's such as the ones described in this bill of of their membership rolls? These are but some of the questions that I have when dealing with laws of this nature.

I would suggest that a far more effective solution would be continued and increased education for those youngsters who are most vulnerable to being seduced by an online predator. Related to this legislation is a recent study (although somewhat controversial) that makes the claim that children are safer online than we had previously thought. In fact, the study indicates that children are far more likely to be harrassed and bullied online by someone they know than be subject to an online sexual predator.
Buzz Snyder, the chairman of the District 14 DFL, has a wonderful LTE in the St. Cloud Times today about the myopic priorities of Representative Dan Severson (R).

So when the Times asks my District 14A Rep. Dan Severson what his top priorities are for the current legislative session, how does he respond?

In a Sunday Times news report, he said we need to politicize the judiciary more by letting judges campaign freely, and then allow their impeachment when we don’t like how they judge.

Oh, and we need to curb the obvious epidemic of voter fraud (who knew?) by requiring state-issued picture IDs at the polls.

This is like Custer fretting at the Little Big Horn that he lost his comb in all the ruckus. Or the Titanic captain, as the last lifeboat is lowered, worrying whether there is enough caviar for the rest of the voyage.

I beseech Severson to instead focus his attention on solutions for the actual (as opposed to the imaginary) problems facing our state and his constituents.

People’s lives are being devastated daily by this economic crisis.

He is in a position of leadership. Please lead.

The best part of the whole thing is to read through the comments. Gary Gross aka "Ray4746" spent the day breaking out the talking points in defense of Severson. The echo chamber surely earned his salary today...

While I applaud the efforts of Snyder, I caution people NOT to be surprised that the guy who has been more concerned about making divorce more difficult than any economic issue would continue ignoring real issues.

Caught the fun over at Let Freedom Ring, the fun interviews by Dan Ochsner of local legislators.

"The Ox", interviewed Representative Dan Severson and Senator Michelle Fischbach, both took a nice shot at Senator Tarryl Clark.
Both legislators talked about Tarryl Clark's taking $30,000+ in per diem in the context of the legislature needing to show leadership in cutting costs with the oversized deficit.
It's true.  Senator Clark, took $30,314.89 in per diem and alternate compensation last year.

$12,864 total in per diem, $9312 during session and $3552 in the interim.
$4,053.19 in mileage.
$10,830 in lodging.
$1,517.70 in travel.
$1,050 for an intern.

She's also in a high profile leadership position within the Senate that requires some pretty extensive travel.

Fiscal conservative legislator Dan Severson made a pretty sizable haul, for someone throwing stones in his glass house, $24,015.41.

$7315 in per diem.
$941 in district travel.
$12,868.47 in lodging.
$2,140.94 in mileage.
$750 in other expenses.

Come on Dan, cut down on some of those lodging expenses!  Maybe they should just sleep in their offices until they get the State's work done?  Kind of like this Congressman from Utah.

Senator Fischbach, a strong fiscal conservative when the money isn't going to her pocket, fared pretty well too, per diem wise.

Fischbach hauled in a whopper...$26,832.98!

$9,888 in total per diem, $9,312 in session and $576 in the interim.
$2,331.25 in mileage.
$1,375 in communications.
$12,738.73 in lodging.
$600 on an intern.

For the record, I believe these per diem and alternate compensation bits are backdoor pay increases and have always opposed them.  So while Severson and Fischbach call out Clark on her per diem and alternate compensation, I would hope that Severson and Fischbach hold themselves to the same standard.




Dear Dan,

In the St. Cloud Times today, you made the following statement:
I was very pleasantly surprised with what I and some others believe we heard from Sen. Tarryl Clark, the assistant Democrat Senate leader, and Rep. Larry Hosch, House Democrat assistant leader. They indicated raising taxes in these tough economic times would not be good.

Excuse me? You "believe" you heard Senator Clark and Representative Hosch say that "raising taxes in these tough economic times would not be good"? Perhaps you could tell us in full context what they actually DID say rather than creating little more than hearsay and rumor.

I understand that you and Representative Seifert would rather set up the terms by which you will later blame than actually coming to the table and making compromises like legitimate public servants. It would be helpful though if you didn't use statements which have already been debunked, even by your own echo chamber (although that acknowledgment and subsequent apology has been conveniently scrubbed).

Unfortunately, I am less and less hopeful as you and your tool, Gary Gross, continue to use these political tactics before even making attempts at working towards solutions.

I am less and less hopeful as Representative Seifert continues to indicate that he is taking his ball and going home. When your leadership indicates within 48 hours of hearing about the problem that you will not be doing anything helpful to solve the problem and will go so far as to vote against any budget bill then your team becomes the problem and NOT the solution.
8:36 AM | Posted in , ,
Rob Jacobs, DFL candidate running against Dan Severson (R) in District 14A, is running an aggressive campaign to unseat Severson. With a St. Cloud Times endorsement in hand, he was out in force yesterday to get out the vote.

In electing DFLer Jacobs, voters certainly will get a less-polished, more progressive legislator. Yet they also are more likely to have a voice in St. Paul who will listen to all sides and then act in a way that best serves most District 14A constituents.

Jacobs has a tall task unseating a Republican in a heavily conservative district but his moderate to conservative views on social issues coupled with the exposure of Severson as a far right ideologue and an increasingly anti-Republican climate could help him across the finish line into the legislature. An even better sign Jacobs is running an effective campaign is when you are being targeted by the local Republican echo chamber. You have to wonder what sort of perceived trouble Severson is in?
A few days ago I posted the St. Cloud Times Editorial Board interviews for House District 15A & 15B candidates with some commentary on those particular races and a prediction about who will be given the endorsement. The St. Cloud Times also did interviews for its endorsements in the House District 14A and 14B races.

In House District 14A you have incumbent Dan Severson (R) going up against Rob Jacobs (DFL). This is a race that is absolutely winnable for Jacobs given his more conservative stances on social issues and the manner in which he has been running his campaign. When you couple that with the problems Severson has with blatant racism, spelling, imposing government even on "traditional" marriage, and perhaps being only the body put forward to fill the seat you have a candidate ripe for defeat.

In House District 14B you have incumbent Larry Hosch (DFL) going up against Jim Stauber (R). I haven't written anything about this race or even much about either of these candidates. However, I have met Larry on several occasions and I can attest to his absolute commitment to getting things done for his constituents and for Minnesota. One interesting thing to watch during these interviews is the number of times (especially during the YES/NO questions) Jim Stauber looks to Dan Severson in order to find out which answer is authorized.

I have cut the full interview into the subsequent questions. However, you will have to forgive the same introduction being added to each question so as to give proper source attribution. Also, it should be noted that the above maps come from Politics in Minnesota.

Candidate Introductions:


Question #1: What are your specific plans for education funding?


Question #2: What specifically (taxes? formula? bill? idea?) are you going to do to fix education funding?


Question #3: What are your specific solutions and what approaches would you support or oppose with regards to the budget deficit?


Question #4: Identify the two areas that you would look to for cuts.


Question #5: What is your position regarding the election and appointment of Minnesota judges?

Editorial Note: This seems like a very random question that will have little bearing on the decision most people will have in voting for an individual.

Question #6: What is your solution to overcoming the partisan divide?


This portion is a series of YES/NO questions:


Closing Statements:


My predictions, for what they are worth: In 14A, Rob Jacobs (DFL) and in 14B, Larry Hosch get the endorsement from the St. Cloud Times. Who do you think will be endorsed and why? Who deserves endorsement and why? Who deserves to be elected and why?
10:01 PM | Posted in ,
Recently, I had two conversations with two entirely separate and unrelated people about the race between Rob Jacobs and Dan Severson. Both of these individuals (one of whom knows Severson personally) made the claim that Severson is not the brains of the operation and that his wife is the one who does most of the work.








I wonder if the people of House District 14A realize that an unelected "shadow representative" is making the decisions and that they have been voting for an empty vessel?
��
8:54 AM | Posted in ,
Dan Severson, Republican from House District 14A, has been serving the district since his first election in 2002. Unfortunately, during that time his legislative record reflects a partisan unwilling to support even the most bipartisan of measures.

On education, I have already discussed the meaningless platitudes offered by Severson on his error riddled campaign site. However, his voting record reflects a bias against public education on the scale of the anti-public education organization known as Edwatch. In the past two sessions he has consistently voted against funding for both K-12 education and higher education. He voted against a one time revenue increase for K-12 education and last year voted TWICE against funding for higher education. The higher education funding Severson opposed would have provided $10 million in grants to veterans and their families in the state. In addition to these grants, the higher education appropriations bill would have established a Minnesota GI Bill Program.

Severson has been a consistent voice against working people in his district and throughout the state by voting against minimum wage increases as well as appropriations for a medical study to "conduct an industry-specific study of workers' health that includes a comprehensive study of lung health."

On vote after vote, Severson demonstrates that he is unwilling to provide even the most basic support to the people living within his district and people living throughout the state. He appears to be much more concerned with providing the public with overtly racist videos and forcing citizens to remain married through government imposed mandates.
��
9:50 PM | Posted in , ,
Dear Mr. Severson,

I understand that you may not have total control of the design and details found on your campaign website, but if you could please fix the numerous spelling errors and grammatical mistakes I would be much appreciated. While it is entirely expected that websites will have the occasional error, it is somewhat disheartening as an educator to have an individual who purports to tell me how to educate have so many spelling and grammatical errors.

So, let us begin at the beginning:

In the sentence directing readers to your biography, the word tells needs to be changed to the word tell. It WILL tell people about your military career. It WILL NOT tells them about your military career.

Under the blue arrow, you will find the word "has". You really ought to consider removing this word given that "there is also an email page" NOT "there is also has an email page".

Finally, the green arrows indicate places that you should consider using a comma to signify items in a list. While this is not always necessary, it does cut down on any confusion about the items within that list. For example, take this sentence:


There is a page on Dan’s stand on education, on taxes and support of business.



Without the comma after the word taxes, one might be led to believe that the taxes you are concerned most about are those affecting businesses and not those affecting the population as a whole.

Now that we have covered some of the most obvious errors found on the front page of your site, let us turn to your issue page:

Aside from the obvious need to clean up your columns and choose one font, there are several errors here that we need to discuss.


I will leave for another day an examination of all the places in which you purport something as undeniable fact without providing even the slightest shred of evidence. The last time that I checked, the Constitution you are referring to is still a proper noun and as such, needs to be CAPITALIZED. I can understand missing an important capital such as the one applied to our Constitution once during a paragraph. However, you missed this obvious error twice during the paragraph. It is interesting that you would miss such a thing when the entire subject of your paragraph is the application of the document. How are we to believe that you understand the Constitution when you are unwilling to give its proper noun credentials?












While most people are aware of what losing their job means, I am not entirely certain people are clear about what loosing their job means. If I loose my job, are there fewer restrictions on what I can and cannot do? Are there fewer responsibilities? Losing your job sounds absolutely terrifying. However, loosing your job sounds like something people may want to look into further. Aside from the fear mongering over issues of energy, Severson has provided a new job related term to our national nomenclature. To loose ones job!
















I can only assume that you are a strong proponent of faith based initiatives and not that you are seeking to initiate the lot of us into your local churches. I have my own church and don't really need any of the brand of initiation that you might be looking to implement.

This may be some sort of Freudian slip indicating the true agenda of Mr. Severson. He is seeking initiates and is going to be using the government in order to get those initiates. However, you weren't supposed to know that.













Just a quick question before we get to the error in this particular paragraph: Are you willing to admit that the people that you get your facts from have an agenda, or is it only the people with whom you disagree that have an agenda?



First, you need to change the word "effect" to "affect" because it is NOT how much effect we have, but rather how much affect we have. Second, let me be gracious and re-write this sentence because it is so jumbled up that it is nearly incomprehensible.

"If global warming is going on, how much AFFECT do we as humans have on it? An even larger question is: Is Carbon dioxide a major contributor OF climate change?"






It does seem, Mr. Severson, that you have an inordinate number of errors on these two particular pages of your website. Perhaps, before you go lecturing my education colleagues and myself about accountability, you could clean up your site thereby gaining some authority.
��
7:21 PM | Posted in ,
His opposition to gay marriage is widely known and most likely supported by the majority of his district. However, there is more to the marriage agenda of Dan Severson than just keeping gay Minnesotans from being able to marry. This legislative session, Severson also co-authored a bill to make it more difficult for married citizens to get a divorce. Deemed "dissolution prevention", the bill seeks to force married couples into government therapy for a period of time before they can legally have a divorce.

1.15 (b) A dissolution of a marriage shall be granted by a county or district court when
1.16 the court finds that there has been an irretrievable breakdown of the marriage relationship,
1.17 except that if the parties have a minor child, a dissolution may only be granted:
1.18 (1) following a period of dissolution prevention as described in section 518.061 and
1.19 after completion of counseling to explore the possibility of preserving the marriage. The
1.20 parties must seek counseling from an individual licensed by the Board of Marriage and
1.21 Family Therapy or by a member of the clergy


Now I am all for couples finding help in working on their marriage difficulties but it doesn't seem like a function of government to force couples to stay with one another and to force them into counseling. In fact, the Severson bill seeks to force couples to continue being married for no less than TWO YEARS before they can finally be divorced.

2.23 Except as otherwise provided in this subdivision, the prevention period required under this
2.24 section begins to run on the date of delivery of the notice under subdivision 2 and must last
2.25 at least two years.

So much for the less government beliefs of the representative from House District 14A.

Cross Posted on St. Cloud Times
��
9:00 AM | Posted in ,
When visiting the campaign website of any candidate there is a certain level of platitude to be expected on any given issue. You hope to see some sense of the direction the candidate will take on the issue but know that there is unlikely to be a detailed rundown.

Checking out the Dan Severson Issue Page, I was quite disappointed that the representative from House District 14A has summed up his entire view on education into two neat and tidy little sentences.

I believe in a strong education system. I also believe in accountability in education funding and local control through parental involvement.


Really, Mr. Severson? Is there someone out there who believes in a weak education system? One clue, however, is that Severson conveniently leaves out the word 'public' from the education system he wants to be strong. I have to wonder if anybody has ever asked him if he really believes in a strong public education system. Are the folks in 14A aware of the fact that Severson is another legislator in the back pocket of extremist organizations such as Edwatch?

Severson believes in accountability in education funding. He is not specific as to what that accountability might be but it typically means he wants funding tied to some sort of test. So, even though he is opposed to NCLB which does ostensibly the same thing that he is actually in support of, he wants the entire evaluation and funding of your school to be summed up by one assessment given on one day and containing questions that require little, if any, higher order thinking skills.

It becomes very tiresome, as an educator, to be told by people who don't support public education in the first place that they know more about education and educating than people who have been in the classroom doing everything they possibly can to get children excited about learning. I can tell you what doesn't get kids interested in learning and that is studying for a bubble test that they are told will pigeonhole their existence and the existence of their school.

If Severson is brave enough, I challenge him to answer the following questions:

1. Do you support a strong PUBLIC education system and reject the mission of Edwatch to establish a NONPUBLIC education system?

2. What assessments do you believe provide the best accountability for any given school? Please describe those assessments in detail.

3. Describe the best pedagogical methods one can use to achieve success.

4. What role should educators play in the education of our children? Should they be creators of educational policy and standards or merely facilitators of the parent's wishes? If they are to be facilitators, how would you solve the problem of having conflicting parental wishes?


If you have other questions for Mr. Severson regarding his beliefs about public education, leave them in the comments section and I will send them along to see if he is up to the challenge. Perhaps if we are persistent enough we can help Severson build a better issue statement to add to the paltry content he currently has displayed.
��
9:53 AM | Posted in ,
Larry Schumacher from the St. Cloud Times contacted me a couple days ago indicating that he was going to do a story on the Severson video.

Here is the story:

Severson defends link to spoof video on campaign site

By Lawrence Schumacher • lschumacher@stcloudtimes.com • June 20, 2008

A link on Rep. Dan Severson's campaign Web site directs visitors to a video of a fake car commercial in which a terrorist tries to blow up a cafe, but is foiled by the car's solid construction.

Listed on the "Family & Fun" page of the Sauk Rapids Republican's www.danseverson.com site since his 2006 race, the link says "Click here to view a funny movie clip." It recently drew the attention of liberal St. Cloud blogger Eric Austin.

"I was looking through his site for information about his beliefs and issue positions," said Austin, who posted an entry about his discovery earlier this week on his blog, Liberal in the Land of Conservative.

The video shows a Middle Eastern-appearing man wearing a bomb vest blowing himself up inside his car. Austin said he finds it offensive because it "makes light of a mode of death that has killed a number of our soldiers" and because of its "racially insensitive undercurrents."

Severson, for his part, called the video a "spoof" that "makes fun of extremists." He said he not only stands by it, but plans to add more links, pictures and videos to his campaign site that "say something about who Dan Severson is."

"It's an antiterrorism message, and I find it strange that some people would get upset by that," the former Navy aviator said. "It's a clear statement that terrorism has horrific implications, and I stand opposed to terrorism."

In the video, the car unbelievably contains the explosion without even damaging its windows. The message at the end says that the vehicle is "Small but tough."

Severson's opponent, Rice DFLer Rob Jacobs, said he's not overly concerned by the clip, but doesn't think it's funny and wouldn't have put it on his campaign site, http://jacobsforhouse.homestead.com.

"I think they should present who you are, what you believe in and what you want to do for your district," Jacobs said of campaign Web sites.

"And I don't think at this level, we have much impact on what's going on in Iraq or the Middle East, so I don't see the point."

Austin acknowledges Severson's right to claim the video as a spoof and satire, but alluded to criticism of Democratic U.S. Senate candidate Al Franken on similar grounds.

"(I)n a campaign season where the Republican Party is getting bent out of shape about every spoof and satirical comment of particular candidates, it seems somewhat hypocritical for Severson to use the exact same defense and believe that others aren't going to call him on it," he said.

Severson said he hasn't updated his Web site for the 2008 election, but plans to add more links and content soon.

"I've got some other things I want to put on, some fun videos to paint a picture of my campaign," he said.


Anybody want to suggest some more racially insensitive or in poor taste videos that Severson can add to his "Family & Fun" page to tell us what he believes?

��
3:33 PM | Posted in ,
On the Dan Severson homepage, you may find a link to his "Family & Fun" page. In amongst pictures of the Severson family you will find what passes for "fun" in the mind of Representative Dan Severson:

If you click on the link you can download the "funny" movie clip which is actually an illegally made clip. The clip itself is, at best, racially insensitive portrayal of a man of Arab descent getting into a VW car only to blow himself up.

From the New York Times:

The spot was sent to the London office of DDB Worldwide, a Volkswagen roster agency, by two people known as Lee and Dan. "We had no part in disseminating it," said Annouchka Behrmann, public relations director at DDB London, part of the DDB Worldwide division of the Omnicom Group. "We think it's absolutely disgusting."


So, are we to believe that watching Arab men blow themselves up is what puts a smile on Representative Severson's face? One only hopes that there aren't any Arab men living in his district because it is perfectly clear what Severson thinks of them.
��
10:31 AM | Posted in , ,
Yesterday I wrote a piece about the Your Turn article in the St. Cloud Times by DFL candidate for House District 14A, Rob Jacobs. As is typical with many of the things I write critical of local Republicans, my friend Gary Gross stopped by to offer his perspective. While he and I have our disagreements at least he offers up substantive arguments rather than baseless attacks.

In contrast, today I found an anonymous commenter had left a message attacking myself and Rob Jacobs.

Bring your boy against Rep. Severson in a debate. I can't wait for that impending disaster from your man crush.

Now I will go shame myself for commenting on your blog and giving you the impression that anybody cares what you write.


While it comes as no surprise that a supporter of Representative Severson would choose to attack by using accusations of homosexuality, what does come as a surprise is that this anonymous commenter arrived onto this site through a Minnesota House of Representatives email address.

So, who is it from a House of Representatives email address (IP Address 209.98.145.174) using attacks such as this? Could it be Representative Severson himself or perhaps a legislative assistant who has decided to take it upon themselves to attack on behalf of Mr. Severson? If it is Mr. Severson, could he think of nothing more with which to defend himself than empty attacks?

There will definitely be more to come as this story develops...

I sent an email to Representative Severson requesting comment:

Dear Representative Severson,

I am a blogger in the St. Cloud area and I recently received this comment on my blog regarding a post I wrote about your opponent, Rob Jacobs.

"Bring your boy against Rep. Severson in a debate. I can't wait for that impending disaster from your man crush.

Now I will go shame myself for commenting on your blog and giving you the impression that anybody cares what you write."

This message originated from a http://webmail.house.mn email address (IP Address 209.98.145.174). I am wondering if you could comment on why someone using a Minnesota House of Representatives email address would feel the need to accuse someone of being gay as if that is something to be ashamed of rather than argue the substance of the issue at hand. It is rather disheartening to believe that people are using government resources to go after citizens of this state. I await your response.

Thank You

Political Muse


Cross Posted on St. Cloud Times

Dan Severson (R) has a letter to the editor in the St. Cloud Times today blaming the "Legislature's Majority" which must be code word for DFL for passing a $925 million bonding bill.

In what must be a preview of the Republican slogan for this fall, he brings up one small piece of the bill ($11 million for the Como Zoo, which by the way is a free zoo which has delighted my children on numerous occasions given that I happen to not be able to afford to treat my children to the more expensive Minnesota Zoo) and attempts to use this piece alone as evidence that the DFL majority is irresponsible. But hey, why should the financially strapped be aloud the pleasure of teaching their children about zoo animals?

Yet, in this politically motivated slam against the "Legislature's Majority" or DFL for those of you not as quick on the uptake, what Mr. Severson forgets to mention is that his colleague, Steve Gottwalt (R), also voted FOR the $925 million version of the bonding bill. Oh, and did Mr. Severson mention that HE HIMSELF voted FOR the $934 million House version that was sent to Conference Committee?

So, I offer this revision to the LTE:

Not even the looming prospect of a billion-dollar budget deficit has persuaded members of the Legislature's majority (AND Steve Gottwalt) to act fiscally responsible.


instead, the House (INCLUDING Steve Gottwalt) passed a bill that is $100 million more than we can afford.


If Pawlenty vetoes the bill, it will return to a House leadership (INCLUDING Steve Gottwalt) that is exhibiting fiscal recklessness with the taxpayers' wallet.


This majority acted irresponsibly the first time the bonding bill was on the floor (Even though I, Dan Severson and my friend, Steve Gottwalt, voted for the bill the first time it was on the floor).


Apparently some folks (INCLUDING Steve Gottwalt) haven't heard this adage: A statesman looks to the next generation; a politician looks to the next election.


If I were Steve Gottwalt, I would particularly outraged at this hit piece penned by Dan Severson. Does Severson really want to portray his Republican colleague as fiscally irresponsible months before the election season kicks into high gear? I certainly hope that those candidates running against Mr. Severson and Mr. Gottwalt remind them of these votes during the election given that it is almost guaranteed that they will attempt to use this bill as a club upon DFL candidates.
7:41 PM | Posted in ,
H/T to Larry Schumacher:

Apparently, Dan Severson (R) dislikes Mexican Americans so much that he voted against a bill that would provide a memorial plaque recognizing Mexican American veterans and ALL other veterans.

Well, perhaps it was going to cost to much for the taxpayer? As you know, Mr. Severson is ALL ABOUT "fiscal responsibility".

Oops, it seems as though a private foundation (AMVETS-Mexican American Post 5) would pick up the entire cost of the plaque.

The Bill:

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA:

Section 1. PLAQUE HONORING MEXICAN-AMERICAN VETERANS.
A memorial plaque may be placed in the court of honor on the Capitol grounds to
recognize the valiant service of all Mexican-American veterans and veterans of all other nationalities, ethnic groups, and subgroups who have honorably and bravely served in the United States armed forces, during both peacetime and war, since the founding of this great nation. The plaque must be furnished by the AMVETS-Mexican American Post 5 and must be approved by the commissioner of veterans affairs and the Capitol Area Architectural and Planning Board.
EFFECTIVE DATE.This section is effective the day following final enactment.


So, what was the ever so eloquent reason to vote against this plaque?

"Even if it honors all veterans, it is still sponsored by just one minority group"


Mr. Severson, are you also opposed to the existence of the memorial to women veterans that already exists?
��
10:01 PM | Posted in , ,
H/T to Larry Schumacher:

Hopefully, I can get a hold of some more information about the challenger, Robert Jacobs, so that we can help him to defeat Dan Severson.

Robert Jacobs, a Minnesota Correctional Facility-St. Cloud employee and AFSCME union president there, announced Tuesday he'll seek the DFL endorsement to challenge Rep. Dan Severson, R-Sauk Rapids, this fall.

Jacobs, a Watab Township resident, said in a news release announcing his campaign that he plans to campaign for more efficiency, transparency and accountability for state agencies, particularly the Departments of Corrections and Transportation.

He said his campaign will emphasize development of renewable energy, repairing state infrastructure and improving the state's transportation system.

"Minnesota can be a frontrunner in the country again and I will help us get there," he said.

School funding and property taxes will also be top issues, he said.

"Why is a student in Sauk Rapids, Sartell or Holdingford worth less than a student in Eagan?" he said. "We must come up with a better funding system than going to the property taxpayers each year with referendum requests."

Jacobs describes himself as a "Pro-Life Democrat."

He said his campaign committee includes former 14A DFL candidates Barb Beniek and Dennis Molitor, as well as former Benton County Commissioner Duane Cekalla.

Democrats this election season have the added bonus of running against a Republican Party bent on destroying itself from within but given the sheep like qualities of Severson and Gottwalt, that advantage may be somewhat moot here.

Mr. Jacobs, if you are out there, send me an email (political_muse@hotmail.com) so that I can help in any way possible.
4:09 PM | Posted in ,
h/t to Larry Schumacher on this one:

Apparently, Steve Gottwalt and Dan Severson will be holding a town hall meeting next Wednesday (December 12th) at Waite Park City Hall. The event will be from 7-9pm and include discussion on a variety of issues. Also in attendance will be House Minority Leader Marty Seifert. At the very least, they should be commended for providing the public an opportunity to discuss their concerns with them regardless of political affiliation. This is in stark contrast to our 6th District Representative who apparently conducts phone meetings from the safety of Washington DC that are open to those people of her choosing.

This line from the Schumacher blog caught my eye:

"As we approach the 2008 legislative session, this is an important opportunity to hear from constituents and discuss priorities for the state," Gottwalt said. "With a projected budget deficit, we need to hold down state spending and refrain from job-killing tax increases."


Perhaps someone should tell Representative Gottwalt that despite holding the line on tax increases, Minnesota still lost jobs over the past four straight months. Depending on my schedule, I may be in attendance at this event to document the various statements made by these local representatives. I encourage other readers of this blog to be in attendance as well so that it is more than a Republican rally. Hey, maybe Leo and Gary will be there so we can meet and exchange pleasantries for the first time. Just a thought...
��