Showing posts with label Legislation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Legislation. Show all posts
9:59 AM | Posted in ,
By Jeremiah Liend

So I’m watching CNN, because I like pain, and this commercial comes on. This lady is shopping and her son comes up and asks to get a book, and she says, I’m afraid not, it’s not in budget, and the child is sad, but he knows that they cannot afford this book. Then the lady looks at the camera and says that there is legislation on the floor to put taxes on juice drinks and soda, and that working class families can’t afford anymore taxes.

My response; Don’t feed your kid soda. I sent a letter to the editor of our local paper months ago suggesting that if we are going to instate taxes on smokers we should tax the hell out of soda, and for once the system appears to be listening to me. Real juice will not be taxed, just the ones that have 1% fruit juice with the rest being high fructose corn syrup. Delicious corn syrup. Years from now my tax dollars are going to be paying for your kids diabetes because you are apparently unaware that Coke is not good for you.

Where is this coming from? Republicans? Soda advocates? Do the Pepsi people have lobbyists? Soda is a multi-million dollar industry, and if we can pay for children with spina bifida to get surgery because your son or daughter just HAS to get some Mountain Dew, then good. Great. The system works.
Category: ,
��
10:58 AM | Posted in , ,
Representative Bachmann, who has previously railed against community service as the potential "re-education" of the children of this country, took the opportunity yesterday in the House of Representatives to vote against a resolution supporting the goals and effectiveness of the AmeriCorps Program.

The text of H. Res. 453:

June 10, 2009.

Whereas the AmeriCorps national service program, since its inception in 1994, has proven to be a highly effective way to engage Americans in meeting a wide range of local needs, national response directives, and promote the ethic of service and volunteering;

Whereas, each year, AmeriCorps provides opportunities for 75,000 citizens across the Nation to give back in an intensive way to their communities, States, and to the Nation;

Whereas those same individuals have improved the lives of the Nation's most vulnerable citizens, protect the environment, contribute to public safety, respond to disasters, and strengthen the educational system;

Whereas AmeriCorps members, after their terms of service end, remain engaged in their communities as volunteers, teachers, and nonprofit professionals in disproportionately high levels;

Whereas AmeriCorps members serve thousands of nonprofit organizations, schools, and faith-based and community organizations each year;

Whereas, on April 21, 2009, President Barack Obama signed the Edward M. Kennedy Serve America Act, passed by bipartisan majorities in both the House and the Senate, which reauthorizes and expands AmeriCorps programs to incorporate 250,000 volunteers each year;

Whereas national service programs have engaged millions of Americans in results-driven service in the Nation's most vulnerable communities, providing hope and help to people facing economic and social needs;

Whereas, this year, as the economic downturn puts millions of Americans at risk, national service and volunteering are more important than ever; and

Whereas 2009s AmeriCorps Week, observed May 9 through May 16, provides the perfect opportunity for AmeriCorps members, alums, grantees, program partners, and friends to shine a spotlight on the work done by members--and to motivate more Americans to serve their communities:

Now, therefore, be it Resolved, That the House of Representatives--

(1) encourages all citizens to join in a national effort to salute AmeriCorps members and alumni, and raise awareness about the importance of national and community service;

(2) acknowledges the significant accomplishments of the AmeriCorps members, alumni, and community partners;

(3) recognizes the important contributions to the lives of our citizens by AmeriCorps members; and

(4) encourages citizens of all ages and backgrounds and from each state to consider serving in AmeriCorps.

      What is AmeriCorps?

      Each year, AmeriCorps offers 75,000 opportunities for adults of all ages and backgrounds to serve through a network of partnerships with local and national nonprofit groups. Whether your service makes a community safer, gives a child a second chance, or helps protect the environment, you’ll be getting things done through AmeriCorps!

      AmeriCorps members address critical needs in communities all across America. As an AmeriCorps member, you can:

      • Tutor and mentor disadvantaged youth
      • Fight illiteracy
      • Improve health services
      • Build affordable housing
      • Teach computer skills
      • Clean parks and streams
      • Manage or operate after-school programs
      • Help communities respond to disasters
      • Build organizational capacity

      Obviously, a dangerous mission that must be stopped..
      9:46 AM | Posted in ,
      There really are times when a piece of legislation passes with less than unanimous support that you have to wonder, how can you be against that? Such is the case with HR 388, a bill "to assist in the conservation of cranes".

      To assist in the conservation of cranes by supporting and providing, through projects of persons and organizations with expertise in crane conservation, financial resources for the conservation programs of countries the activities of which directly or indirectly affect cranes and the ecosystems of cranes.


      Our very own Michele Bachmann decided that there was something in this bill that merited a NO vote. What that something is, I imagine we will never know but apparently she and her conservative brethren have decided that cranes specifically and conservation in general are something on which to be opposed.

      Perhaps the crane will be used in some sinister socialist plot or perhaps it is because these birds so flippantly ignore our borders with their "migration" patterns and thus must be feared. For more on this global scourge, you can visit their obviously communist conservation site.
      ��
      Representative Larry Haws sent out a press release today about the passage of HF1301, Omnibus Public Safety Policy Bill:

      HAWS VOTES FOR OMNIBUS PUBLIC SAFETY POLICY BILL

      ST. PAUL, MN – State Representative Larry Haws joined House legislative leaders to pass the Omnibus Public Safety Policy Bill (House File 1301)134 to 0 votes.

      "This is a good public safety policy bill that provides some positive provisions that will go a long way to keeping Minnesota on track with public safety issues that impact us all,” said State Representative Larry Haws.

      The Omnibus Public Safety Policy Bill contains a number of provisions that would strengthen requirements on predatory offenders, ease mandates on state agencies during these tough budget times, and assist local agencies in times of emergencies.

      "This bill contains some legislation I co-authored to ensure that felons have an advantage to ‘game the system’ so they can work it out to not go to prison but to a county jail," said State Representative Haws. "This is a real savings to the County taxpayer while extending justice to Minnesotans. I also authored legislation that clarifies current law that sentences imposed for assaulting a correctional officer must run consecutively, not concurrently, to any remaining sentence. Sentencing guidelines will be in place to prevent folks from taking advantage of the system and face just punishment.”

      There isn't much to say about a bill that apparently everyone liked. It is nice to see though, a brief moment of pure bipartisanship...
      5:54 PM | Posted in ,
      A friend of the blog sent me an email today about "concerns" Michele Bachmann has about the Land Management Bill the President signed into law today. While this friend pointed out how closely these "concerns" mirrored those of her corporate puppets, I found it more interesting that her "concerns" and her post in general are little more than a copy and paste job from the Republican Study Committee legislative bulletins site.

      From the RSC:

      On March 11, 2009, House Republicans defeated identical legislation (S. 22) under suspension of the rules. After defeat, the Senate considered the legislation again by bringing up the House-passed Revolutionary War and War of 1812 Battlefield Protection Act (H.R. 146) and replacing its text with the text of the House-passed Omnibus Lands Package (S. 22). Procedurally, this means the House can only “concur” with the Senate amendment and prevents House Republicans from offering a motion to recommit.


      and from Michele:

      On March 11, 2009, House Republicans defeated identical legislation (S. 22) under suspension of the rules. After defeat, the Senate considered the legislation again by bringing up the House-passed Revolutionary War and War of 1812 Battlefield Protection Act (H.R. 146) and replacing its text with the text of the House-passed Omnibus Lands Package (S. 22). Procedurally, this means the House can only “concur” with the Senate amendment and prevents House Republicans from offering a motion to recommit.

      The concerns set forward by the RSC with handy dandy marks so that conservatives can cut along the dotted line and not have to think too hard:

      And from Michele:

      KEY CONCERNS:

      – Blocks millions of acres from new oil and gas leasing, logging, mining, and all other business activity in these areas.

      – Eliminates 1.2 million acres from mineral leasing and energy exploration in Wyoming alone - withdrawing 331 million barrels of recoverable oil and 8.8 trillion cubic feet of natural gas from domestic energy supply.

      – Designates more than 2 million acres of land as wilderness areas; permanently eliminating human access for energy exploration or recreational opportunities.

      – Eliminates a proposed terminal site for importing liquefied natural gas (LNG) in Massachusetts by designating a river that runs through a city as “wild and scenic”.

      – Authorizes $5.5 billion of new discretionary spending over five years and $900 million of direct spending.

      – Makes collecting fossils an illegal activity, subjecting thousands of hobbyists to 5 years in federal jail.

      – Pork Projects: $3.5 million to the city of St. Augustine, FL for a birthday party, $200,000 for a tropical botanical garden in Hawaii, $250,000 to study the birthplace of Alexander Hamilton in the U.S. Virgin Islands, and $37 million for a park in New Jersey that is not even supported by the National Park Service.


      You will notice that she gives no credit to her overlords at the Republican Study Committee and represents these concerns and this writing as her own. I understand the use of talking points but to completely lift the entirety of those talking points word for word and pawn them off as your opinion seems intellectually dishonest.

      After reading this you have to wonder what percentage of the "concerns" Michele Bachmann has on any issue are her own and what percentage are verbatim talking points cut and pasted directly into her brain. Perhaps we in the 6th District are now being represented by the Republican Study Committee? In the future, if I have a question or comment about legislation will I need to contact the RSC in order to determine the opinion of Representative Bachmann?

      Cross Posted on Dump Bachmann
      ��
      8:43 PM | Posted in ,
      It has been some time since I have written anything substantive about Michele Bachmann. Perhaps I just needed a break from the thought that this person continues to spout the most virulent rhetoric and somehow retains a seat in our government. Perhaps I have raised the white flag and come to terms with the fact that this woman cannot be defeated in this part of Minnesota. Perhaps I simply don't have the energy to keep up with every offensive or downright ignorant thing that the Congresswoman from the 6th District has to say.

      So, from henceforward I am going to try avoid wrapping my brain around the completely nonsensical things that come out of her mouth and stick to the completely nonsensical votes she casts within the House of Representatives.

      Let us begin with an interesting NO vote taken on February 23, 2009. What was this heinous legislation that needed to be defeated? Titled 'Guam World War II Loyalty Recognition Act', it essentially recognizes the suffering of residents of Guam during WWII Japanese occupation and recognized the loyalty of those residents to the United States.

        (a) Recognition of the Suffering of the Residents of Guam- The United States recognizes that, as described by the Guam War Claims Review Commission, the residents of Guam, on account of their United States nationality, suffered unspeakable harm as a result of the occupation of Guam by Imperial Japanese military forces during World War II, by being subjected to death, rape, severe personal injury, personal injury, forced labor, forced march, or internment.
        (b) Recognition of the Loyalty of the Residents of Guam- The United States forever will be grateful to the residents of Guam for their steadfast loyalty to the United States of America, as demonstrated by the countless acts of courage they performed despite the threat of death or great bodily harm they faced at the hands of the Imperial Japanese military forces that occupied Guam during World War II.
        So, Michele, what do you have against Guam?
        ��
        While I applaud the effort to keep children safe from predator's that lurk on the internet, it seems like an unworkable proposition to make it illegal for them to access social networking sites. Such is the case with House File 130 being co-authored by Representative Severson (R).

        How does one effectively police this type of situation? The only way someone is found to be an online sexual predator is typically after the damage has been done. If your goal is keeping children safe, we need to find ways to stop the initial predatory act.

        After this point, how many resources will it take to police their internet usage and online memberships? How much liability is there on the part of these sites to keep predator's such as the ones described in this bill of of their membership rolls? These are but some of the questions that I have when dealing with laws of this nature.

        I would suggest that a far more effective solution would be continued and increased education for those youngsters who are most vulnerable to being seduced by an online predator. Related to this legislation is a recent study (although somewhat controversial) that makes the claim that children are safer online than we had previously thought. In fact, the study indicates that children are far more likely to be harrassed and bullied online by someone they know than be subject to an online sexual predator.
        There are plenty of issues on which Steve Gottwalt (R) and I disagree but the process of governance works best when you find those issues that you do agree upon and work together. Such is the case with House File 224.

        I question the need to put a Constitutional Amendment out there for what appears to be no other reason than reacting or over reacting to the current recount process. However, the one piece of the legislation that I think is common sense is the formation of retention elections for judges in the state.

        As it is, there are very few people in the state who pay even the slightest attention to judicial candidates on the ballot. My theory has always been that if I haven't heard of them then they must be doing just fine and deserve to remain seated. A retention election would essentially put my theory into practice. Rather than a process by which people use any number of schemes to pick their judicial vote, they can simply decide yes or no on should this person keep their seat. Let's hope this bill gets the attention it deserves...
        Earlier this month I posted a DFL press conference introducing House File 2 which will drastically change the way public education in Minnesota is financed. In order to get a clearer picture of this legislation, I sent off some questions to one of the bills co-authors, Representative Larry Haws. I have taken the liberty of mixing his answers with some of my own commentary:

        The key benefit of this new system will be a simplification of public school funding coupled with increases in state aid and reductions in property taxes. The current system creates a situation in which those areas that can continually raise the property tax revenue to adequately fund schools are doing so while those economically impoverished areas are left with substandard services, not because they don't care about education but because their populations simply cannot handle property tax load. It is creating a system of haves and have nots in public education.

        One of the key components that I like and that Haws explained in his response email is the phase in portion of the legislation. Rather than a simple switch over and influx of money into the system, the new Minnesota Miracle is open ended and its phase in period will be determined as it travels through committee and floor analysis.

        Sec. 41. PHASE-IN.
        Subdivision 1. Baseline revenue. A school district's baseline revenue equals the
        revenue amounts for the aid appropriations calculated under Minnesota Statutes, section
        126C.20, calculated using the current year's data and the revenue formulas in place in
        Minnesota Statutes 2008.
        Subd. 2. New revenue. A school district's new revenue equals the revenue amounts
        for the aid appropriations calculated under Minnesota Statutes, section 126C.20, calculated
        using the current year's data and the revenue formulas in place under this act.
        Subd. 3. Phase-in schedule. A school district's revenue amounts for the revenue
        formulas listed in subdivisions 1 and 2 equals the district's baseline revenue plus the
        percent of the difference specified in subdivision 4 multiplied by the number of years
        of the phase-in specified in subdivision 5.
        Subd. 4. Percentage. The phase-in percentage equals ... percent.
        Subd. 5. Years of phase-in. The new revenue under this section is phased-in over
        .. years.
        EFFECTIVE DATE.This section is effective July 1, 2009.

        Directly from the email:

        Here are a few specifics and benefits of the bill:

        • Increases formula allowance to $7500, indexed to implicit price deflator.
        • Uses a scalable blueprint that can be phased in over several years.
        • Equalizes the pupil weighting system for students in kindergarten through high school to 1.0.
        • Enhances compensatory aid and funding for English language learners.
        • Fully funds voluntary all-day kindergarten
        • Fully funds state special education costs by removing existing caps.
        • Includes a levy referendum offset of $500 per pupil in districts with levies; provides $500 per pupil to districts without a levy in place.
        • Accounts for declining enrollment in every geographic region of the state.
        • Includes innovation and accountability measures including a requirement that a district use 5 % of its basic revenue for innovative, research-based programs to improve academic performance.
        • Creates a new school bond agricultural credit equal to 66 percent of the property tax on agricultural properties attributable to school bond levies. This will help promote equitable funding to rural districts, as it will help rural districts more easily pass referenda--if school districts and voters agree that they are needed.

        Unfortunately, in this economic climate I am not sure how much enthusiasm there will be to this kind of wholesale overhaul of the current system. The bill appears to be sound and take into account just this kind of issue with its phase in but only time will tell if it can gain momentum in the state legislature. My hope is that my representative, Larry Haws, will help make this bill happen.
        One of the current bills working its way through the Minnesota House of Representatives, is meant to examine and possibly eliminate unnecessary or burdensome state mandates placed on lower levels of government in the state of Minnesota.

        Section 1. ELIMINATING STATE MANDATES.
        Subdivision 1. Intent; purpose. To ensure that public services are delivered as
        cost-effectively as possible, it is the intent of the legislature to eliminate unnecessary
        state regulations and mandates. By July 1, 2010, mandates or regulations that result in
        unnecessary paperwork, are redundant, or contain outdated or irrelevant requirements
        shall be eliminated or revised. Requirements that are necessary to protect the health
        and well-being of Minnesotans or that are necessary to meet federal requirements shall
        not be eliminated.
        Subd. 2. State mandate review. Any county, city, school district, professional
        association, or other entity affected by state mandates may submit to the legislature a
        list of mandates that are required by state statute or rule that the entity determines to be
        unnecessary or in need of reform. The legislature shall review the mandates that have
        been submitted.


        Representative Haws (DFL) has been on the state mandates kick ever since his first election to the Minnesota House and I applaud him for making good on this particular promise. Any time that we can reevaluate programs, rules, and regulations to make things run more smoothly we should do that. In fact, this bill should be more than a one time event. We should be carrying out these evaluations on a yearly basis. My only problem with such legislation is the possibility that certain mandates that are effective and useful to one part of the state will be cut entirely if another part of the state deems them unnecessary. My hope is that these mandate reviews will take this possibility into account and the result will be effective government throughout the state.
        A while back I had the opportunity to exchange a few emails with some local representatives in order to find out about their priorities for the upcoming legislative session. Representative Hosch (DFL) made it clear that his primary focus is improving health care and that it is from that that other problems and issues could be addressed.

        He currently is working with Representative Seifert (R) and Representative Thissen (DFL) to, as I understand the legislation, provide oversight to rural health care cooperatives whose goal is controlling costs and improving access to vital health services.

        I sent off some questions to Representative Hosch so that he might explain this legislation:
        *Is this legislation addressing a specific problem in the health care system?
        *How, specifically, does this legislation improve access to health care in rural areas?

        Typically, I am of the opinion that we need large scale reform of the health care system whether through single payer or universal health care. However, I am also a pragmatist and realize that if the choice is between fixing part of the problem or fixing nothing because we can't come to an agreement over the solutions, then we need to be fixing the parts that we can agree upon.
        DFL leaders this week held a press conference to discuss the introduction of House File 2. The bill would change the system by which we finance education.



        It sounds a little too good to be true and I will not be holding my breath this session hoping that this new system will be implemented. However, I did send off an email to Representative Larry Haws (DFL) to answer some of the questions I have about the bill.
        6:21 PM | Posted in ,
        A bill floated into the Labor & Consumer Protection Division in the Minnesota Legislature today whose purpose appears to be giving those people who have subprime mortgages that are heading into foreclosure the opportunity to defer said foreclosure.

        "Emergency Help For Homeowners in Foreclosure: IMPORTANT: You are eligible to have the foreclosure of your home stopped until at least (end of deferment period). The state of Minnesota recently passed a law that lets homeowners stop a foreclosure sale. To qualify, you must currently live at the home in foreclosure and intend to live at the home until the end of the deferment period. You will also need to complete and sign a special form (called an "affidavit") and provide that affidavit to us at the following address: (insert address in the state of Minnesota). There are many government agencies and nonprofit organizations that can help you complete this affidavit. For the name and telephone number of an organization near you, please call the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency (MHFA) at (insert telephone number/Web site). The state does not guarantee the advice of these agencies. Do not delay dealing with the foreclosure because your options for foreclosure deferment end with the foreclosure sale."

        Someone is going to have to help me out on this one because the way I read it is that there is no restructuring of the mortgage or stopping of the foreclosure so that the occupant might be able to remain in the home. It is simply to delay the occupants from being removed from the home. Aside from giving them more time to find a new residence, what is the purpose of this bill? Also, my reading indicates that there is a sunset for this bill which would mean someone applying for deferment towards the end of this act would not be afforded much time.

        While it seems like a good idea, I am somewhat confused about how this will positively affect those people struggling with a subprime mortgage.
        ��
        7:25 PM | Posted in
        H.R. 6515 or the "Drill Responsibly In Leased Lands" Act was unable to get the two-thirds majority needed for passage today. The essence of the bill is to get the oil companies to begin drilling in the 68 million acres of available federal land open for leasing. Despite the propaganda on the right, the vast majority of available oil is on land and in areas offshore that are NOT under any current ban.

        From Speaker of the House Pelosi's legislation page:

        National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska (NPR-A): Mandates that the Bush Administration conduct annual lease sales for 5 years to ensure that the lands in the NPR-A are more rapidly leased for oil and gas production. Even though it has more oil than the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (10.6 billion barrels vs. 10.4 billion barrels) and it has been open to drilling for 26 years, only four lease sales have been conducted since 1999, and only 14% of the NPR-A is leased. The bill will protect sensitive areas, such as around Teshekpuk Lake. Unlike ANWR, which is protected by law from drilling as an environmental preservation area, NPR-A is already designated for oil and gas production so it could occur more rapidly. Based on EIA projections, oil production in ANWR is four to six years behind that of the NPR-A.

        Extension of Oil and Gas Pipeline to the NPR-A: Requires the Transportation Secretary to facilitate the necessary pipeline infrastructure to bring the producing oil fields in NPR-A online. Right now, available pipelines reach to within 5 miles of NPR-A. The bill requires project labor agreements for both the NPR-A and Alaska Natural Gas Pipeline to provide good paying jobs.

        Alaska Natural Gas Pipeline: Requires the President to work with the Canadian government, state of Alaska, and oil and gas producers to facilitate construction of the pipeline. While this pipeline was proposed in 1976, and Congress authorized up to $18 billion in loan guarantees for this project in 2004, there has been no progress in building this critical energy infrastructure under the Bush Administration. The planned pipeline would have a daily capacity of 4 billion cubic feet of natural gas, or almost 7% of current U.S. consumption. Not only is this pipeline critical to our energy security -- transporting natural gas from Alaska to America’s Midwest -- it will create good-paying American jobs and would be among the largest construction projects ever undertaken.

        Banning the export of Alaskan oil: Reinstates the Alaskan export ban that was in place from 1973 to 1995, imposed to ensure that American oil helps the American people. In 2000, about 7% of crude oil production from the Alaskan North Slope was exported to South Korea, Japan, and China.

        Use It or Lose It: Requires oil companies to diligently develop leases on federal lands (onshore and offshore) that they are already holding. If they cannot certify that they are doing so, they must give up the unused leases — so that someone else can develop them – before obtaining any new leases.

        Fair Return on Production of Federal Oil and Gas Resources. Directs the Interior Secretary to take steps to ensure that federal oil and gas lease holders are making prompt and accurate royalty payments so that the owners of these lands, the American taxpayers, are fully reimbursed for their use.


        Preserving American Natural Resources

        Untouched Beaches and Coastline – President George H.W. Bush put in place a moratorium on certain offshore drilling by executive order in 1990 in response to the catastrophic Exxon-Valdez oil spill. A Congressional ban has existed for more than a quarter century, since 1981. Drilling would expose the nation's shores to oil spills and other threats at a time when coastal resources — fisheries and habitats especially — are already severely stressed. These shorelines and waters are also critical to the multibillion-dollar tourism industry. There have been at least 117 spills in the Outer Continental Shelf waters since 2000. There are 33 million acres of the federal OCS lands that are under lease but are not producing, and nearly 80 percent of offshore oil is already in areas that are open for exploration. Opening new areas to development would save consumers little at the pump -- a decade or two down the road.

        Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR) – Alaska’s ANWR is one of America’s last pristine untouched wilderness areas – home to more than 250 animal species and birds. The potential benefit of drilling oil in ANWR is pennies per gallon a decade or two down the road – a point on which even Senator John McCain agrees.

        While my favorite Congressman, Tim Walz, saw fit to vote for this common sense legislation as did nearly every member of the Minnesota delegation, Michele Bachmann and John Kline voted against this bill in favor of a mythical dream of $2 per gallon gasoline.

        From the YouTubes:






        Category:
        ��
        12:20 PM | Posted in ,
        Yesterday, in the House of Representatives, a vote was taken to ensure that in the case of voting machine failure your vote would be counted and not lost in the ethos. The bill, H.R. 5803, provides grants (something that Michele Bachmann has previously stated she supports) to states with electronic voting machines. The grants would allow them to create a system of backup paper ballots in the unfortunate circumstance that a machine fails and data is not able to be recovered.

        To direct the Election Assistance Commission to establish a program to make grants to participating States and units of local government which will administer the regularly scheduled general election for Federal office held in November 2008 for carrying out a program to make backup paper ballots available in the case of the failure of a voting system or voting equipment in the election or some other emergency situation, and for other purposes.


        One would think that election security and election fairness would be at the top of the priority list for both political parties. However, for Michele Bachmann and the majority of the Republican Party it appears as though this is not the case. Bachmann and her Republican colleagues oppose providing grants to ensure that your vote as well as the votes of everyone using electronic voting machines are backed up and thereby verifiable. I sent the folllowing email to her office for comment:

        Dear Mr. Miller,

        I was wondering if Representative Bachmann could provide me with a comment as to why she chose to oppose H.R. 5803. She has previously supported the idea of grants over earmarks but seems to be voting against bills that provide grants. Also, paper ballots would ensure that all votes are counted. What about a backup paper ballot is Representative Bachmann opposed to?

        Thank You

        ***********


        As always, I will wait patiently for a response but will not hold my breath as many of my questions to my representative go unanswered.

        Cross Posted on Dump Bachmann & St. Cloud Times
        ��
        8:42 PM | Posted in ,
        Our friends over at Bluestem Prairie exposed some right wing lunacy:

        Misreading MarketWatch: would "Bachmann's" bill bring gas down to $2?

        We had a good belly laugh today when we read an attempt to use a recent MarketWatch article to defend Congresswoman Bachmann's prize press conference pandering for the "No Excuse for This Energy Act."

        Readers may remember that Bachmann claimed that enacting the legislation--not a bill she actually authored or introduced, mind you, just one she decided to co-sponsor in April--would bring down the price of gas to $2 in four years.

        We can certainly understand why Mitch Berg at Shot in the Dark ( crossposting to True North) would glom on to an article with this headline:

        Gas could fall to $2 if Congress acts, analysts say

        to vindicate the widely-ridiculed Mrs. Bachmann. Unfortunately for that reading of the article, the details tell a much different story about what might make gas prices fall. Hint: a different piece of legislation.


        The right wing blogosphere in Minnesota is going to try to latch on to any news (even if it tells the opposite story) to try sell their myth that drilling will solve the current state of gas prices. Go to Bluestem for the full story...
        ��
        9:00 AM | Posted in ,
        In another episode of Michele Bachmann supporting "All of the Above" in our quest to energy independence is a piece of legislation that not only flies in the face of her all of the above claim but also runs counter to the claims she has made recently that this Congress has not tried to provide tax incentives for alternative energies.





        H.R. 5351 was passed by the House of Representatives on February 27th of this year:

        To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide tax incentives for the production of renewable energy and energy conservation.


        Once again, Bachmann voted NO on providing tax incentives for renewable energies. Surely, given how truthful she has been on ANWR and Outer Continental Shelf Drilling, she just forgot about voting on these tax incentives given that she is now in favor of "All of the Above".

        Cross Posted on Dump Bachmann
        ��
        6:00 PM | Posted in ,
        Michele Bachmann has been traveling the district claiming that she supports an "All of the Above" strategy for achieving energy independence. Unfortunately, when Bachmann says all of the above what she really means is she demogoguing drilling for oil and the rest of that global warming voodoo technology deserves no attention. Let's be clear, when it comes to energy independence and voting on alternative energies, the record of the Congresswoman from the 6th District is atrocious.



        One of the first orders of business for the 110th Congress was H.R. 6:

        An Act to move the United States toward greater energy independence and security, to increase the production of clean renewable fuels, to protect consumers, to increase the efficiency of products, buildings, and vehicles, to promote research on and deploy greenhouse gas capture and storage options, and to improve the energy performance of the Federal Government, and for other purposes.


        Michele Bachmann had the opportunity early in her term to work for all of the above, but rather than doing that she voted against it. Not only did she vote against this legislation one time, she voted against this legislation to invest in renewable fuels (a hallmark of 'All of the Above') a total of three separate times. This will be the first in a series of posts examining the voting record of what it means to be for "All of the Above".

        Cross Posted on Dump Bachmann
        ��
        3:45 PM | Posted in , ,
        In what can only be described as a vote to ensure that we all have the freedom to choose the primate of our choice, Michele Bachmann stood up to those that believe we probably shouldn't be keeping exotic animals as pets.

        H.R. 2964 makes it illegal to "import, export, transport, sell, receive, acquire, or purchase nonhuman primates (such as monkeys or apes)".

        Unfortunately, ultra-liberal organizations such as the American Veterinary Medical Association are out there trying to convince people that owning and selling primates isn't the coolest thing in the entire world.

        Between 1995 and 2005, there were 132 injuries or escapes by primates in the United States, according to the coalition. Also, some 80 percent of health and behavioral issues pertaining to primates involve those kept as pets.

        Dr. Golab told subcommittee members that the evidence is clear that primates kept as pets are unsafe. Not only are these animals a physical threat, they may also be a source of the herpes B virus and other zoonotic pathogens. "Make no mistake about it," Dr. Golab, said, "nonhuman primates kept as pets—while cute and often very entertaining—can also pose serious injury risks for their human caretakers and other domestic animals."

        You can't tell me that a few injuries aren't totally worth it to have the freedom to keep and sell primates. The Humane Society chimed in on this one and sent out a press release attacking our poor Representative whose only job is to make sure we have the freedom to choose the primate of our choice.

        Rep. Michele Bachmann Votes Against Protecting Primates, Public Health and Safety

        (June 18, 2008) WASHINGTON — Last night, U.S. Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.) yet again voted against a common-sense animal welfare measure that was overwhelmingly approved by the U.S. House of Representatives. This time, she voted against a bipartisan bill called the Captive Primate Safety Act, an anti-cruelty and public safety measure written to stop the movement of primates for the pet trade. The House of Representatives passed the bill by an overwhelming vote of 302 to 96.

        "Primates belong in the wild, not in our basements and bedrooms," said Michael Markarian, president of the Humane Society Legislative Fund. "Michele Bachmann is out of step with Minnesota citizens who want common-sense animal welfare policies and want their communities protected from dangerous attacks and diseases."

        The bipartisan Captive Primate Safety Act, H.R. 2964, prohibits the interstate and foreign commerce in apes, monkeys and other primates for the exotic pet trade. These animals can inflict serious injuries and spread life-threatening disease, and the average pet owner cannot provide for the animals' basic social, psychological and physical needs in captivity. These highly intelligent and social creatures are often confined in small cages, and their teeth are pulled out to make them less dangerous.

        Twenty states, including Minnesota, already prohibit private possession of these animals as pets, but primates are easily obtained over the Internet and through out-of-state dealers and auctions, making federal legislation necessary to complement the efforts of state law enforcement. The bill has received strong support from a broad range of scientists and organizations, including Dr. Jane Goodall, the American Veterinary Medical Association, and the Association of Zoos and Aquariums.qq

        In Minnesota, a boy pried open a trailer door at a 2004 fair, allowing several monkeys to get loose; a capuchin monkey bit two people before being recaptured.

        The Humane Society Legislative Fund notes that Rep. Bachmann has consistently voted against common-sense humane laws. She has voted to allow the trophy shooting of threatened polar bears, and to allow the commercial sale and slaughter of wild horses and burros from public lands so their meat can be consumed in foreign countries.

        Congratulations, Mrs. Bachmann, on being one of only 96 Representatives to understand that owning primates is totally awesome and should be kept legal. For being one of a brave few to look past the injuries and the diseases and the abuse that these exotic animals are accompanied with.

        Cross Posted on Dump Bachmann
        ��
        11:06 PM | Posted in ,
        Last month the unemployment rate in the United States took its largest jump upwards in twenty years going from 5% up to 5.5%. Today in the House of Representatives they voted on extending unemployment benefits by 13 weeks to address the number of people currently running out of such benefits. Unfortunately, under the rules necessary to pass this particular legislation they needed a two-thirds majority and came up just three votes shy of that mark.

        The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee put out a press release condemning the continued obstruction of House Republicans to solving the current economic slowdown:

        DCCC Chairman Chris Van Hollen released the following statement after the vote:

        "House Republican efforts to defend the status quo and protect George Bush's and John McCain's failed economic polices have reached a new low. Less than one week after the largest one-month jump in America's unemployment rate in two decades, House Republicans blocked passage of a bill to extend unemployment insurance to workers, who are struggling to find a new job in this slowing economy.

        "This is a firm reminder that Republicans are absolutely comfortable with the status quo and are completely out of touch with the harsh economic realities facing American workers."



        It will come as little surprise that two of those NO votes were Minnesota Republicans Michele Bachmann and John Kline. Now I am fully aware that Michele Bachmann continues to cling to the belief that this Bush economy is the greatest thing since sliced bread and that we should be proud of our "workingest" state but it is no less disheartening to watch as my representation in Congress spits in the eye of our unemployed and tells them that if we extend benefits they will invariably become lazy slobs. So, from the archives I leave you with this all too relevant Michele Bachmann classic:



        Cross Posted on Dump Bachmann & St. Cloud Times
        ��