Showing posts with label Politics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Politics. Show all posts
9:54 PM | Posted in
My first year teaching Civics, I was searching for a resource on the internet that had a variety of examples of propaganda using campaign commercials. What I stumbled across was from the Museum of the Moving Image and its 'The Living Room Candidate' collection of what I assume is almost every Presidential campaign commercial dating back to the 1952 campaign.

The site has become more functional since I last visited way back then but it is still a really cool look at the history of our elections through campaign commercials...

My favorite? Check this out from 1952:



I would totally vote for Ike!
Category:
��
11:10 AM | Posted in ,
The Republican Party, the party of NO:



No ideas, No solutions, No leadership, just NO! It becomes difficult to build a movement around being against everything...
Category: ,
��
1:58 PM | Posted in ,
I don't typically buy into the I'm OUTRAGED meme but words escape me on this one. First, what Democrat is out there blaming "responsible achievers who paid their mortgages"? Second, even if there are Democrats out there making these ridiculous claims, how do you make the logical leap to the physical extermination of an entire group of people?

Is it me or are conservative cartoons more vitriol and less snarky humor?
Category: ,
��
12:56 PM | Posted in , , ,
While many conservatives look to drug addict Rush Limbaugh as the pinnacle of their movement, it appears as though RNC Chair Michael Steele finds Limbaugh "incendiary" and "ugly".



From Politico:

“Rush Limbaugh is an entertainer,” Steele said. “Rush Limbaugh, his whole thing is entertainment. Yes it’s incendiary, yes it’s ugly.”

Steele’s comments, first noticed by NBC producer Chris Donovan, are sure to rankle Limbaugh in part because they validate the liberal critique of the conservative force: that he’s merely an “entertainer.”

This Steele fellow is great! He is doing more for the Democratic Party than they could ever do by themselves. Perhaps Bachmann is right, "YOU BE 'DA MAN!"

11:58 PM | Posted in , ,
H/T to The Cagle Post:Is it any wonder that they so desperately want to believe in creationism?
Category: , ,
��
1:50 PM | Posted in , ,
There are few things more annoying in this country than the constant drumbeat of who is and who is not a "typical" American. That we continually feel the need to define some people as more American than other people and engage in endless pissing contests over abstract concepts such as patriotism is both tiresome and completely unhealthy.

The fight continues with conservative pundit, Michael Barone, and his latest article entitled "No Permanent Majorities in America". While the crux of the argument is fine, that permanent majorities are unrealistic, the basis on which he comes to this conclusion is filled with little more than conjecture and the same old divisive politics I am hoping people will soon reject.

Democrats are now hoping that their party can achieve something like permanent majority status.
I know of NO Democrat who is seriously believing that we will attain ANYTHING like a permanent majority status. While this may have been the goal of Karl Rove, it is not and should not be the goal of Democrats. Why? Frankly, because it is stupid to believe that the electorate will allow one party to rule permanently. Is it possible that the Democratic Party could do such an amazing job of governance that people will continue electing them for a long time to come? Sure, but it is equally possible and probably more likely that the party will get kicked to the curb at some point in the future because political parties and those individuals within the parties screw up all the time and deserve to be punished for those screw ups.

Far more egregious than this baseless statement is the manner in which Barone tries to prove that permanent majorities are unsustainable:

The Republican Party throughout our history has been a party whose core constituency has been those who are considered, by themselves and by others, to be typical Americans. In the 19th century, that meant white Northern Protestants. Today, it means white married Christians.

The Democratic Party throughout our history has been the party whose core constituencies have been those who are considered, by themselves and by others, to be something other than typical Americans. In the 19th century, that meant white Southerners and big city Catholics. Today, it means blacks and singles and seculars and those with postgraduate degrees.

This is such oversimplified garbage that it is difficult for me to know where to begin with the proverbial beat down. The Republican Party as "typical Americans" vs. the Democratic Party as "something other than typical"? Does it concern Barone at all that he has just defined the likes of Jefferson, Madison, Monroe, & Jackson (ALL white southernors and ostensibly the beginnings of the Democratic Party) as something other? Does it concern him at all that he has explicitly made the claim that the only typical Americans during the 19th century were white Northern Protestants? One has to wonder what empirical evidence he might have to prove such a baseless claim? Does he realize that his explanations are so broad and so vague as to leave them utterly without merit?

Had he couched his arguments with the reality that the Republican Party has typically been the party of the dominant class while the Democratic Party has been typically a collection of different minority and special interest groups, I would have been fine. However, he chose the divisive nature of typical vs. atypical to define these parties in order to make the claim that throughout its history the Democrats have not been as "American" as the Republicans.

Being a minority or being a resident of a particular region or being a member of a political party makes you no less typical than any other American in this country. Once people start actually believing that and recognizing that we will all be better off and we will not have to have these useless debates about who is more "America". I will say this, however, that if the Republican Party continues to use this style of divisive rhetoric, then perhaps we will have some sort of sustained majority or perhaps it will be replaced by another party which serves to unite rather than divide.
Republican spokesperson and publisher of Politics in Minnesota, Sarah Janecek, is on record with some predictions for Tuesday and they don't look good. If these predictions come to pass, then there will only be two Republicans left in the delegation Minnesota sends to Congress. Only Norm Coleman and John Kline will remain in this post 2008 election world.

On the race in the 3rd District:

DFLer Ashwin Madia narrowly bests GOP former Rep. Erik Paulsen mostly because the 3rd District Republican party scared better, more ideologically moderate GOP candidates out of the race. This is a painful loss for the state GOP which has proudly held this seat for decades with strong, smart, social issues-moderate leadership in Bill Frenzel and Jim Ramstad.

This is a clear shot at the choice of Erik Paulsen who is clearly not in the mold of moderate, Jim Ramstad. Paulsen represents the continued race to the right that has so damaged the Republican Party in Minnesota. Talking to people that know Ramstad well, it is clear that it is the race to the right which drove Ramstad to leave.

Janecek adds this caveat:

The good news for Republicans going forward is that because the Democratic National Congressional Committee spent so much time and effort on this race, Madia will be beholden to casting liberal party-line votes, making 2010 an attractive run for Republicans who opted out in 2008.

Not to bust the chops of Ms. Janecek but I believe it is the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee.

On the race in the 6th District:
DFL challenger Elwyn Tinklenberg beats one-term GOP incumbent U.S. Rep. Michele Bachmann and sends Chris Matthews a bottle of Dom. What were Bachmann's advisers thinking by allowing her to go on MSNBC with Matthews? What was Bachmann thinking by using "anti-American" in her words? Channeling former GOP WI Sen. Joseph McCarthy was red meat on a platter for the left. Let the 2010 GOP fun begin on who will run against Tinklenberg in a seat he should never have won.
I make no predictions but Republicans appear to be bracing for another bad night in Minnesota politics!
4:21 PM | Posted in , ,
On this day, of all days, Jeff Rosenberg has put out a call to take ONE day off from the ludicrous character assassination politics. In honor of this day, I repost (which I notice was also filled with those willing to ignore any sense of decency) my own 9/11 story:

I was a young student teacher preparing for another day at Middle School in northern Minnesota. Another teacher, I cannot remember who, came into the room to inform us that a plane had hit the World Trade Center. The thought of terrorism far from our minds we wondered what tragic accident could have caused such an event. As the day began, word came to us that a second plane had run into the second tower. Obviously, this was no longer a tragic accident, but a horrendous act of barbarity by men without conscience. So many thoughts ran through my head that day as we tried to make the children's school day as normal as it possibly could be. From rage and the hopes of revenge to worry about the effects it would have on my students, I ran the gamut of emotions and reactions to the amazing event.

From TIME Quote of the Day:

��
9:35 AM | Posted in
Has anyone else been less than satisfied with major cable news (I rarely watch broadcast news) coverage of the Democratic National Convention? It seems to me that they spend most of their time with talking head pundits telling you what is going on at the convention rather than letting you watch the proceedings and decide for yourself what is transpiring. They only show the major, primetime speeches and diss the rest of the interesting, if occasionally boring, speeches and goings on. Could it be that they have an agenda to foment or are they just to cheap to spend the money to have actual reporters actually report. I have taken to watching the CSPAN coverage, which simply lets the speakers speak without all the punditry. MSNBC has had the most palatable coverage but they have been pretty much Democrat cheerleaders. CNN and Fox continue to find controversy where there is none, searching the hall far and wide until they find that one Clinton delegate who tearfully admits they still are having a hard time accepting Barack Obama as the nominee, setting them up as a salient exemplar of "massive" dissension in the ranks. Oh well, after all, they wouldn't have jobs unless they were able to create the controversy they hunger for, especially where there is none. Just another indication that the media is no longer about reporting the news and has become mere "infotainment". Maybe I'll go see a movie instead.
Category:
��
6:38 PM | Posted in , , ,
For all the discussion of dis-unity in the Democratic Party, there has been surprisingly little discussion about the lack of enthusiasm and perhaps even dis-unity in the Republican Party.

Two items for consideration:

First, for all their demagoguery of the drill issue, it appears as though they are unwilling to come right out and say that the party stands for drilling everywhere:

The GOP’s presumptive nominee, John McCain, doesn’t support drilling in ANWR, and the majority of the committee’s members didn’t want to put the platform at odds with him, according to Congressional Quarterly.


So, the choice for Republicans is to put aside their love of oil drilling and support a candidate and a platform that simply does not reflect that love. Most Republicans in this area did not support John McCain (including Michele Bachmann) but have since put aside their distaste for him to shill for him. How many more principles are they willing to forego for the sake of the (R) behind a candidates name?

Second, there is the issue of anthropogenic climate change. While most sensible human beings have acknowledged that it exists, the base of the Republican Party is vehemently opposed to any and all acknowledgment of its existence. Yet, when they vote this November, it will be for a party now willing to accept the existence of anthropogenic climate change:

"Increased atmospheric carbon has a warming effect on the Earth," The Hill reported the draft document as saying. "While the scope and long term consequences of this warming effect are the subject of ongoing research, we believe the United States should take measured and reasonable steps today."

What will the deniers in the Republican Party do now? Will they give up their denial and vote for a party acknowledging climate change or will they give up another belief for the sake of the (R)?
6:14 PM | Posted in , ,



Category: , ,
��
8:24 PM | Posted in
A friend of mine from college, Jeremiah Liend, is currently running (for the second time) to become Mayor of Bemidji. Good luck, Jeremiah!






From his website:

A letter from Jeremiah:

Dearest Bemidji,

Hello there. I am Jeremiah Liend. Today I filed for the office of mayor. It is a decision I have considered well during the last four years. Four years ago I ran for the same office on a platform of change. I ran with a campaign budget of $200. I ran for the common man. Over 1,200 fine people cast their lot with me in the belief that I had the ability to affect change and I thank them for their votes. Four years later I have seen little change for the better.

The last few years I have been listening. I do not listen merely in conference rooms or halls. I listen where my people congregate. My people work the unpleasant jobs that keep the stuttering gears of commerce grinding away. My people are uninsured and desperate for a chance. My people are a renegade assortment of artisans and merchants hoping for the American dream to be more than just that. My people are mad as hell. They are the people who encourage me to fight the good fight and to that end, I enter the ring. To my people I tip my hat and assure them that a vote for me is a vote for them.

There are a number of failures and shortcomings I could rail against. Every mistake over the last four years has been mentally catalogued and filed. But I do not want to play that game. I don’t want to tear anyone down or point fingers. Rather I would like to offer a vision of something better. More complete and powerful than anyone is willing to offer these days. Inside me dwells a pack of dreams and machinations to make Bemidji into the city I know it can be.

The people in power want to see Bemidji evolve into the next Brainerd or Saint Cloud. The cities they strive to become are limited by their fear of the unknown and the grumbling dissent of the old guard’s status quo. I have no such fear. When I look into the future I see Bemidji taking it’s rightful place as the crowned city of the Mississippi, a sibling of the Saints Paul and Louis and the mouth to New Orleans roar. The one city the mighty Mississippi would travel north to visit deserves better. I defy those who claim it cannot be done. We are a community of great people and I truly believe that, working together, there is nothing we cannot accomplish.

I have assembled a series of stratagems called “The Bunyan Initiative”. It’s end game is to make our city famed and prosperous. Our Florence but requires the Medici, men and women with the power, will, and ability to invest in the vast reserves of talent we have left unexplored for far too long. When I look at the marvel of Bemidji what I find most amazing [and tragic] is not that it lacks in ability and resource, but that our leaders have not used them. Production companies lurk in basements, desperate for assistance. Local business owners facing recession combat a legion of corporations without ally or weapon. Three great colleges see students arrive, learn, and escape without a second glance to an anemic and failing job market.

Amid it all I find myself wanting only one job and one charge. I want the office of mayor for but a two year term in which I hope to wrestle the wheel of progress away from the discouraged and fearful and direct our course into a bright new future. A future where taxes are eliminated and not raised. A future where our people speak out and our leaders listen. This is your wake up call to the revolution. You need not live in anger and fear of being ignored any longer. I will bring your word to those in power and they will tremble from your assembled voice.

I make these promises: First; I will fill every vacant downtown storefront with local business owners by the end of my two years. The first component of “The Bunyan Initiative” details just how to do it. Second; I will always vote for bids to go to local companies. The time of throwing your tax dollars out of Bemidji will end. We are not a group of bumpkins and incompetents but a powerful assembly of greater Minnesota’s best and brightest. And finally I promise to place the struggling masses of rent-poor wage-earners that this city is built on in the forefront of every policy I enact and every vote that I cast.

Four years ago I ran on a platform of change. I ran for the common man and nearly a quarter of Bemidji believed I had the ability. Four years later I have seen little change for the better. This time around I am taking no prisoners. I need your help to make this revolution a reality.

If everyone who voted for me in the prior election convinced two other people to vote for me, it would be a victory for the books. I thank you in advance for your time, your vote, or any other assistance you would lend to me.

Yours most sincerely,

Jeremiah T. Liend


He also has a video up on youtube:

Category:
��
9:27 PM | Posted in , ,
One of the things that we can all agree upon, whether Democrat or Republican, is the need to keep a watchful eye upon our elected representatives. Until the advent of the internet, constituents relied on the print media to get the bulk of their information from the legislature.

An important resource that many people throughout the state may have overlooked is the Minnesota House of Representatives Public Information Services website.

The mission of House Public Information Services is to provide credible and timely nonpartisan services that inform the general public of legislative actions, educate the public about the legislative process and encourage public participation in the Minnesota Legislature.

Among other things on the site, you can find Session Daily and Session Weekly. As these are nonpartisan publications, they can be used by anyone to get the spin free version of happenings in the legislature.

One of the most important tools found on this site is the live video feed of the legislature as well as the video archives. For example, today the DFL held a press conference to discuss the veto override of the Transportation Bill. I was able to download the press conference and view a triumphant moment from the comfort of my couch.

In fact, here it is:





The only issue I have with this service is that it only uses Windows Media Player for its videos. As a Mac user I am forced to download extra software just to view the archives from the legislature. Additionally, as a blogger I try to add informative video to this page through my youtube site. The addition of a Quicktime option on this site would allow for easy transfer and distribution of legislative activities and press conferences.
��
10:57 AM | Posted in , , ,
My good friend Blue Man has ventured into the world of the youtube and is quickly filling his page with local events and candidates. I encourage everyone to check it out.

A couple videos of note are my State Senator, Tarryl Clark, speaking about transportation and the confirmation of Carol Molnau and Bob Olson speaking on the importance of unions and education for building the middle class.



Blue Man writes:

Senator Clark outlined Governor Pawlenty's transportation "plan". It's simply a red pen. Pawlenty wants to bond for roads and bridges in need of great repair. Despite the fact that the state will be seeing possibly a billion dollar deficit, Pawlenty's "plans" are all revenue neutral, result in no increases in taxes.

That's not a plan.


I wake up every morning thankful that, despite my lack of representation in Congress, at least I have Tarryl Clark and Larry Haws representing me in the state legislature.



Blue Man writes:

I'll try to get some You Tubes up later today from the SD 19 "Breakfast of Champions" event in Buffalo yesterday. Both Bob and Elwyn delivered remarks yesterday.

Olson's speech had substance. Elwyn delivered a great speech, but he said nothing. Other than a few "Yes we can" chants from Elwyn, it was well delivered but devoid of any ideas or solutions.

My sense is that Elwyn thinks he has the endorsement sealed up. Labor was in full force for Elwyn in Buffalo yesterday. He'll obviously secure the labor vote, but what will progressives do? Will this be a repeat of 2006 where progressives support Olson and labor supports Tinklenberg, with the progressive voter winning out?


Great Job, Blue Man!
12:32 PM | Posted in , ,
In yet another edition of "Perhaps THIS Is Why," a Minnesota conservative blogger shows his true feelings for the voters of the state. The Admiral, as he calls himself, has essentially called the electorate in Minnesota stupid for a vote they have yet to even cast.

I don't really have any confidence in the Minnesota voter. Unquestionably, the most unintelligent in the nation. Ready and willing to pay higher taxes, and buying in to the malarkey. "As long as it's for the outdoors," or, "Hey, it's for education," or another, "Well, it's for the roads." And their willingness just goes on and on and on.


So when you here that Minnesotans are some of the smartest people in the country, no. Not even close.


I bet they say, "D-uh, well it's for the outdoors. D-uh, okay, I can live with that!"


While I disagree with many of the policies and solutions proposed by Republicans in the state and across the country, I have never considered everyone of them ignorant or uninformed. There are times I don't understand how they can believe the things they believe, but I would never simply refer to them as ignorant or uninformed. Someone in the Republican Party really ought to talk to this particular voter and let him know that the last thing that they need is for supporters to go around calling Minnesotans stupid unless of course they enjoy losing elections. I am no expert, but I don't think "Vote Republican, STUPID!" is the most effective way to win the hearts and minds of the electorate.
8:48 PM | Posted in , ,
So, let's try for full fledged heresy because I don't want to be accused of giving things only half effort.

While I have been wishing and praying for a Huckabee candidacy, it now appears as though it isn't going to happen. Why not? Given that those of faith have been in direct contact with the big guy upstairs and I have no doubt that Huckabee himself has put in a call or two (I suspect he has a direct line) to God, there must be something wrong. I mean, the Lord wouldn't allow one of his chosen people to be defeated, would he? Does a Huckabee loss disprove the existence of God? Does God just not really like Huckabee? Did John McCain pay off God to stay out of the race? So many questions, so few answers...

We demand answers God! Certainly, if Karl Rove can orchestrate a win for one of the least qualified candidates in history, then surely you can find the strength to give Huckabee the nomination. We all understand that it is a lot of work orchestrating an entire universe and smiting all those people that Pat Robertson says deserve to be smoten, but surely you can find time out of your busy ethereal existence to prove that Huckabee has the God seal of approval.

If not for me, God, at least do it for our good friend Andy Barnett. He has been wishing so hard (even though he had a brief loss of faith and backed that Mormon fellow) and has even been found quoting the David v. Goliath story from that book that you had written by your many ghost writers. I would really hate for his young believing heart to be dashed due to your continued absence in this race.

Your immediate attention in this matter will be greatly appreciated!
Category: , ,
��
4:25 PM | Posted in
Having been born in North Dakota and spending my early years living on its doorstep, I can attest to the fact that North Dakotans have little interest in the style of politics practiced by much of the country. That is why this story seemed to me like such a no brainer:

Big-Donor Politics Elude North Dakota

Published: January 31, 2008

By far, this state has trailed the nation in large donations per capita to the presidential candidates, an analysis of the candidates’ early contributions of $200 or more shows. While donors in New York gave more than $2.50 a person, if every person in the state gave (for a total of more than $48 million), and California gave more than $1.40 for each person (for a total of more than $51 million), North Dakotans offered up 9 cents a person (for a grand total of $57,613).


Politics in North Dakota is an entirely different animal than in the rest of the country or even here in Central Minnesota. It is not a matter of economic status as the article tries to hint at towards the end but rather a matter of culture and priorities. I have somewhat of a unique perspective on this subject having grown up in the area and having done some fundraising for the North Dakota Democratic NPL Party.

On Culture: Perhaps it is the prevalence of Scandinavian blood in the state which dictates that no matter what you believe, you mind your business and don't air your dirty laundry in public. This certainly extends into the political arena. Growing up, I don't know that I ever saw a yard sign or even heard people publicly discuss their political positions. It was one of those things, much like religion and family matters, that was kept to yourself.

That is precisely why it was such a culture shock to move closer to the Twin Cities where politics and political discussion rages on in a very public manner.

On Money: It seems to me, due to this culture of privacy, that North Dakotans detest putting themselves out there by giving even those they support any money. When I did fundraising, from a fairly reliable list of Democrats, it was almost as if we had the wrong list. It literally took every ounce of power to keep these people on the phone for an extended period of time. To top it off, North Dakotans hang on to their money more than perhaps any other people on the planet. It was rarely a situation where they didn't have the money but rather of not being interested in talking about politics with some stranger on the phone. This is a place where people driving Cadillacs are considered a little too flamboyant for our tastes.
Category:
��
4:29 PM | Posted in , ,
Yesterday, a politically active conservative friend of mine emailed me to ask about some thoughts I had on the current state of the Presidential race. What I realized from that email is that I haven't been paying much attention to the state of things ever since my preferred candidate dropped out in Iowa.

So, to get back into the swing of things on a national level I have created two polls in the left sidebar to gauge the level of support in both the Republican and Democratic contests here in Minnesota. I will leave the polling open until Monday, February 4th. The only thing I ask is that ONLY people living in Minnesota participate and that you vote only ONCE.

To top it off, I am inviting ALL visitors to participate in the first ever Liberal in the Land of Conservative political chat on February 4th.

How does it work?

1. At 6pm, on February 4th, you can come to this website and click on the big smiley face in the left sidebar to participate in this live discussion. You will not need a log in name or a password and can remain anonymous if you choose.

2. If you would like to expand the chat window, simply click on the button with the four arrows pointing outwards to the four corners. That will allow you to chat in the full screen version of the room.

What will we discuss?

Given that the following day is Super Tuesday, we will discuss the prospects of Democratic and Republican candidates for President. Other topics of discussion may include the Senate race here in Minnesota or simply politics in general.

Disclaimer: As the moderator of this chat room I reserve the right to ban anyone or boot anyone who cannot abide by basic rules of civility. So, let's keep things respectful and perhaps these will become a regular feature!
7:28 PM | Posted in , ,
"Support the Troops, but not their welfare!"

I don't typically post specifically on the Iraq War and this will not be the beginning of a trend. However, I had to comment on recent votes in the Senate. If Republicans cannot even support a measure giving troops the same amount of rest time as combat time, they really cannot seriously claim to "support the troops." If it is acceptable for Republicans to consistently question the support of democrats, then turnabout is fair play in the case of this bill. It is increasingly clear that Republicans have little interest in protecting the mental and physical welfare of our men and women in uniform!

Senate rejects attempt to regulate combat tours
Blockage of bill a defeat for Democrats struggling to challenge Bush on Iraq

Updated: 5:53 p.m. CT Sept 19, 2007

WASHINGTON - The Senate blocked legislation Wednesday that would have regulated the amount of time troops spent in combat, a blow for Democrats struggling to challenge President Bush’s Iraq policies.

The 56-44 vote was four votes short of reaching the 60 needed to cut off debate. It was the second time in as many months that the bill, sponsored by Sen. Jim Webb, D-Va., was sidetracked. In July, a similar measure fell four votes short of advancing.

Failure of the bill was a sound defeat for Democrats, who have been unable to pass significant anti-war legislation by a veto-proof majority since taking control of Congress in January. Webb’s measure was seen as having the best chance at attracting the 60 votes needed to pass because of its pro-military premise.

The bill would have required that troops spend as much time at home training with their units as they spend deployed in Iraq or Afghanistan. Members of the National Guard or Reserve would be guaranteed three years at home before being sent back.

Most Army soldiers now spend about 15 months in combat with 12 months home.

“I think it’s very important that we just put a safety net under our troops,” said Webb, a Vietnam veteran and former Navy secretary.


There is some additional analysis on dailykos:

The Filibuster: now painless and more convenient than ever!
��