Downmarket
5 hours ago
that if they will stop telling lies about the Democrats, we will stop telling the truth about them." -Adlai Stevenson (1952)
Senator Clark outlined Governor Pawlenty's transportation "plan". It's simply a red pen. Pawlenty wants to bond for roads and bridges in need of great repair. Despite the fact that the state will be seeing possibly a billion dollar deficit, Pawlenty's "plans" are all revenue neutral, result in no increases in taxes.
That's not a plan.
I'll try to get some You Tubes up later today from the SD 19 "Breakfast of Champions" event in Buffalo yesterday. Both Bob and Elwyn delivered remarks yesterday.
Olson's speech had substance. Elwyn delivered a great speech, but he said nothing. Other than a few "Yes we can" chants from Elwyn, it was well delivered but devoid of any ideas or solutions.
My sense is that Elwyn thinks he has the endorsement sealed up. Labor was in full force for Elwyn in Buffalo yesterday. He'll obviously secure the labor vote, but what will progressives do? Will this be a repeat of 2006 where progressives support Olson and labor supports Tinklenberg, with the progressive voter winning out?
He does have some incredibly sound ideas about energy independence and prosperity without pump-price shock and he is as sound on transportation issues as El Tink - without any of the revolving door baggage that attaches to Tinklenberg on that front.
Before I post any thoughts or impressions I have - from never meeting the man but knowing a bit of what he stands for from reading his website - I will let his own campaign card from the caucus table tell everyone a bit about him.
The Taxpayer Choice Act “ would make permanent the current capital gains and dividends tax rates and create a voluntary Simplified Tax that would give individuals the option of paying under a highly simplified income tax system or under the regular income tax as it is structured now.
As a main sponsor, Minnesota’s Congresswoman Michele Bachmann issued a press release that the system needs to be changed to “give taxpayers the ability to choose how they wish to pay federal income taxes: 1) through the regular income Tax Code as it is currently structured; or 2) through a "Simplified Tax" that has just two income tax rates: 10 percent for joint income below $100,000 and 25 percent for income above. The Simplified Tax also includes a generous standard deduction of $25,000 for married couples, or $12,500 for individuals and a personal exemption of $3,500. The combination is equivalent to a $39,000 exemption for a family of four.
Now the first reaction is how will this be paid for ? The national debt is rising and the Bush tax cuts are not reducing the debt (see last paragraph).
Second, if the Simplified Tax is elected, income offsets such as those listed on Schedule A Deductions (home mortgage, property tax, medical, etc.) as well as Earned Income Tax credits (Child credits) are eliminated. Thus taxable income would be the same as gross income ( for many that are their wages) with the allowance for the Standard Deduction and Personal Exemption.
Third, once a taxpayer made the choice to switch, it could only be switched back once more during their lifetime unless there is a change in martial status (or death.)
Fourth, the winners win more (or the rich get richer.) The current tax system includes rates at 28%, 33% and 35% levels (which effectively start after the Adjusted Gross Income is over $123,700 for Married filing jointly). So, if you are in the highest bracket, under the Simplified Tax, the rate would be 25%.
Fifth, even if you do not elect the Simplified Tax, the legislation makes the Capital Gains and Dividends rate cuts permanent (they were scheduled to expire in 2009.) A review of IRS records indicate that “13,776 tax filers with adjusted gross incomes in excess of $10 million — a mere 0.01 percent of all filers — received 28.2 percent of the total tax savings. Their average tax break was $1,876,280 each. The affluent win again !
Sixth, if the objection to the current tax system is that it is too complex and filled with subsidies and special allowances, then how is adding one more system going to make it simpler?
The real problem with the Taxpayer Choice Act is that some members in Congress are falling for it. HR 3818 has 86 co-sponsors (including John Kline but no other Minnesota Congressmen) which is more than the FLAT TAX proposal.
The Republican ace in the hole for elections is Tax fear-mongering. As the campaigns start, voters will hear about the Taxpayer Choice Act, but not the nuts and bolts of how it works … and that will be combined with chants that “those Democrats will raise your taxes.”
Blogroll addition
Posted: 9/12/2007 at 12:01 AM
I'm adding Liberal in the Land of Conservative to my blogroll of St. Cloud area-based political blogs.
Written by Political Muse, an eighth-grade teacher in St. Cloud who doesn't list a name or e-mail address, the blog has been up and running since the summer.
Check it out, especially for an interesting exchange between its author and Gary Gross of Let Freedom Ring, another blogroll member.
Copyright 2008. All right reserved. Theme Design by Good Design Web | © 2008 Liberal in the Land of Conservative Bloggerized by Falcon Hive.com