Showing posts with label Election 2008. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Election 2008. Show all posts
I pondered for some time what to do in my classroom for Inauguration Day. It didn't seem appropriate for me to simply turn the television on, sit back, and let a day slip through my fingers without some greater lesson being taught. So, as a class we began by examining the oath of office as laid out in the Constitution:

Oath of Office
"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."

Actually, after today my students probably knew the wording of the oath better than Chief Justice John Roberts (*wink*). As a class we took the words and rewrote the oath using synonyms. Full Disclosure: That idea was borrowed from other sources...

Rather than simply focusing on the speech of Barack Obama, we took a look at the Inaugural Addresses of five of our most famous President's. However, 8th graders are not well suited to reading and understanding the full context of these speeches so I plugged each of them into wordle. This allowed students to examine the broad themes and main ideas of the speeches rather than get bogged down in detailed language.

Students were asked to examine the word clouds without knowing what President or even what time period from which they originated. As they looked over each one their task was to discover and write about the commonalities running through each, discover and write about the differences running through each, and finally write about anything unique they found within each speech.

President ?

President ?

President ?

President ?

President ?
While I wish I had more time to really dig into this activity, the kids did a great job finding the basic themes that ran through the speeches of these five important President's. They were even able to figure out which speech belonged to which President for three out of the five. You can try out this activity in the comment section...

Unfortunately, I wasn't able to get to looking at some of the modern addresses which have been captured for posterity. Check them out for yourself:

And today, Barack Obama...
6:50 AM | Posted in
With the margin in the Minnesota Senate race down to 2 votes now, I've had a few people ask if I regretted my vote for Dean Barkley.

Simply put...

No.

My vote was not a "protest vote".  I was not trying to "send a message."

I listened carefully to what the candidates had to say.  I watched or listened to every debate and informed myself of where the candidates stood on the issues important to me.  

In this race, I liked where Dean stood on many issues and I like him as a person.  I felt as though he would better represent people like me and that Franken and Coleman were simply the status quo.

Considering the guy was outspent 1600-1 by Franken and Coleman each, I'm proud of what he was able to do.

Candidates have to earn my vote, you don't just get it because you have a D or an R behind your name.  

The notion of a wasted vote is a fallacy.  I would have wasted my vote voting for Al Franken, because I do not believe in him.  I do not think he will be a good United States Senator.  That's my feeling, my opinion.

To follow the flawed logic of the wasted vote,  I should throw out any concept of principle and simply vote for candidate one or two based on who will do less evil.  Of course, if the race is a blowout, feel free to vote for the candidate of your choice, but if it's close...you should regret that decision.  "It's all your fault".

Where does this logic come from?  Seriously?  This is what is wrong with American politics.  

To use a sports analogy...

You can only root for the Yankees or the Dodgers, since they have all the money.  Or Duke, or the Patriots, Celtics, etc...

To root for any other team is a waste of time.  

BS

So, no regrets from November 4th by this kid.  In fact, seeing the incredible drama coming from both the Coleman and Franken legal teams, I'm proud of my vote for Barkley.


Category:
��
6:57 PM | Posted in
It was a fabulous night for Democrats as Barack Obama took back the White House and expanded the map beyond what many thought was possible. Although the House and Senate gains were less than we had hoped, it was a very ambitious strategy and the reality is that you cannot win them all.

The one disappointment of the evening is that for all of the money and campaigning that took place across Minnesota to send more Democrats to Congress, the numbers look to remain unchanged with Erik Paulsen defeating Ashwin Madia and Michele Bachmann defeating Elwyn Tinklenberg.

Locally, my good friend Larry Haws will remain one of my favorite legislators and continue to annoy my right wing nemesis, Gary Gross. While we were unable to bring Joanne Dorsher, Rob Jacobs, and Steve Andrews into the fold the reality is that these are very difficult districts for the DFL to compete in. Regardless of all that they put up valiant efforts and should be commended.

There were a couple rays of hope for the DFL here in conservative country and they took place in the heart of the empire, Senate District 16. Gail Kulick-Jackson was able to eak past a former public educator who has turned out to be one of the most vocal anti-public education legislators. By a bare bones 89 vote margin, Gail was finally able to take down Sondra Erickson turning the northern half of SD 16 blue. The other ray of hope has much to do with the deranged mission of one Mark Olson. He and his supporters deserve a big thank you for taking a principled stand in favor of domestic violence which shaved off an almost certain Krueger win into a squeeker win for Lisa Fobbe. I would encourage Mark to continue his crusade against the Republican Party in Senate District 16 by running against Mary Kiffmeyer next time around! With his help, we can turn the entire area blue...
Category:
��
7:27 PM | Posted in , ,
This could be your year:



Over the last month, North Dakota moved once again in the direction of Barack Obama. This is a truly amazing shift given that the state last went for a Democrat in 1964 and George W. Bush won the state by a 30% margin. It is time to call anyone and everyone you know in North Dakota and get them out to vote!
I really do wish that these people that keep throwing around words like socialist and communist would actually study them and gain even a basic understanding so that they can stop looking foolish by throwing them around so flippantly. For that matter, people on the left ought to stop throwing around the word fascist too but that is a topic for another post.

Sarah Palin and John McCain keep throwing around this threat of socialism and have earned themselves another PANTS ON FIRE award from Politifact.

So when Wurzelbacher brought up a flat tax, Obama responded by endorsing progressive taxation – the principle of taxing those with higher incomes at a higher percentage than those with lower incomes. And it is in that context that Obama said he wanted to "spread the wealth."

Progressive taxes do indeed spread the wealth a bit. But they do so much more modestly than government owning the means of production.

Few serious policy makers — including McCain — consider progressive taxation socialist. In fact, on the Oct. 26, 2008 edition of NBC's Meet the Press, McCain stood by a comment he made in 2000 that "there's nothing wrong with paying somewhat more" in taxes when you "reach a certain level of comfort."

If McCain would like to argue to the American public that progressive taxation is unfair I would encourage him to do that but to throw out terms like socialism to describe such a system demonstrates just how much the Republican Party has lost its way. You would think that even prominent local economists would recognize such a glaring fact!

So no, Obama's tax increase on those making more than $250,000 would not represent a transformation of the U.S. system of government. His desire to "spread the wealth" through progressive taxation makes him no less a capitalist than McCain, or Lincoln. Palin's allegation that Obama wants to "experiment with socialism" seems designed less to inform than to inflame. That's Pants on Fire wrong.
8:21 PM | Posted in ,
November 4th cannot come soon enough and if you, like me, are looking for ways to keep from going absolutely insane there is some help from 23/6:

Look, eight days is a long time and you're not going to help the cause if you get thrown in a mental hospital before you get the chance to vote. You need to hang on! 23/6 is here to help, with eight tips on making it through the next eight days without losing it.

Category: ,
��
7:05 PM | Posted in ,
Only 8 days ago, Barack Obama drew an astounding 100,000 people to a rally in St. Louis. Once again today, at a rally in Denver:
NINE days to go! Let's not get complacent nor over-confident...
��
Despite his role in the lead up to the Iraq War, I have long held the greatest of respect for General Colin Powell. In fact, if he were to run for President as a Republican I would cross over and vote for him in an instant.

That being said, he gave one of the most stirring endorsements I have seen in favor of Barack Obama for President. His rebuke of the current Republican Party was undeniable and should serve notice to everyone in the party that they are driving away more people than they are bringing into the party. Also, he said what needed to be said about the "he's a muslim" issue in a way that makes those that continue to raise it out to be the true bigots that they are by asking, so what if he is with a story following that inspires.



Update: In response to the Powell endorsement, Andy Aplikowski demonstrates the increasingly irrational nature of the conservative wing of the Republican Party. The response? Why, Powell is a LEFTY of course! At what point will we all be "lefties"? If the Republican Party continues to purge itself of every moderate they may find themselves with only a handful of members bickering amongst themselves about who is the most "staunch conservative". I for one encourage Aplikowski to keep purging until he is a party of ONE.

But his selection as Secretary of State may have been President Bush’s biggest mistakes. This was Powell’s first real big chance to let his own personal policies bleed through, and guess what. He isn’t a staunch conservative.
5:04 PM | Posted in ,
A rally in St. Louis, Missouri for Barack Obama drew upwards of 100,000 people today. WOW!
��
7:43 PM | Posted in ,
On October 15th, I will be twittering the third and final Presidential Debate between John McCain and Barack Obama. While my second attempt at twittering the debate was thwarted by school meetings that ran longer than expected there are no such meetings tomorrow and am ready to rumble. As usual, my twitter cohort Jeff Rosenberg of Twin Cities Daily Liberal will join me.

Don't know what Twitter is? It is a social networking/short messaging service that you can sign up for and use to follow people.

You can follow me on Twitter at Political_Muse or you can keep track of comments on the left sidebar here on Liberal in the Land of Conservative. However, if you are looking for serious commentary of each candidate, then you have come to the wrong place. My Twitter is meant for mockery and high levels of sarcasm!

Also, you can join me in the official Liberal in the Land of Conservative chat room. Click on the image below and chat away (there is no sign up required).

Geesee CHAT
��
6:52 PM | Posted in ,
While some bloggers would like you to believe that sign vandalism is the domain of one political party, this is actually a bipartisan problem:

From my inbox
:

Attached is a picture of the handiwork of some of our domestic terrorists in Becker, Mn. This is the eighth sign I have had vandalized or stolen, as have several other neighbors. The McCain signs in the neighborhood have never been touched.
While there may be a prevalence of theft on one side or the other in different areas of the state, there is little doubt that folks on either side are guilty of vandalism. If you have any examples of sign vandals (whether they are liberal or conservative), you can send them to me and I will post them here.
��
5:15 PM | Posted in , ,
The last time I wrote about the polling being conducted in my birth state of North Dakota there was a strange phenomenon taking place with Barack Obama running in a statistical dead heat with John McCain. However, the addition of Sarah Palin had not been polled and as I expected, McCain surged ahead in the next few polls and it appeared that the strange blip was over. Within weeks Obama even pulled his campaign staff from the state and relocated them to other areas of the country.

New polling from Minnesota State University Moorhead looks as though the statistical dead heat has returned. Once again, I say that if McCain cannot hold onto a state like North Dakota that hasn't voted Democratic in over 40 years and that Bush won by over 30%, then he is in for an absolute beat down.

This image, from electoral-vote.com:
Both Dailykos and Talking Points Memo have begun noticing this blip and while it certainly could be nothing more than an anomoly it is an interesting phenomenon that has not been given much notice by the rest of the media.


The money line:

Joe Biden: "In my neighborhood, where I came from when you got to say something to a man you look him in the eye and say it to him"
9:50 PM | Posted in , ,
4:31 PM | Posted in , ,
This new ad from the Obama camp is right on the mark and should be run ad nauseam every time the McCain camp trots out their message of smear and fear:

9:38 PM | Posted in ,
Tuesday, October 7th I will be attempting to twitter (I have a meeting in the evening that may run into the start of the debate) the second Presidential Debate between Barack Obama and John McCain. Hopefully, my tag team partner Jeff Rosenberg of Twin Cities Daily Liberal will join me.

Don't know what Twitter is? It is a social networking/short messaging service that you can sign up for and use to follow people.

You can follow me on Twitter at Political_Muse or you can keep track of comments on the left sidebar here on Liberal in the Land of Conservative. However, if you are looking for serious commentary of each candidate, then you have come to the wrong place. My Twitter is meant for mockery and high levels of sarcasm!

Also, you can join me in the official Liberal in the Land of Conservative chat room. Click on the image below and chat away (there is no sign up required).

Geesee CHAT
��
2:38 PM | Posted in , ,
John McCain wants us to believe that when he said the "fundamentals of our economy are strong" he meant the workers in this country. We may be strong but after nine months of job losses I don't know how much more strength we have left:

9:58 AM | Posted in , ,
Throughout the debate on Thursday, Sarah Palin tried desperately to paint herself as the only one who could possibly understand what it was like to raise a family and make "kitchen table" decisions. This was a HUGE mistake given the person she was debating who has seen family tragedy and has come through that tragedy with flying colors. NO ONE can claim that Joe Biden has been anything less than a stellar example of fatherhood and of the family values our leaders should espouse.

��
I am going to be entirely honest here, the debate last night left me confused and discombobulated (it's a word, look it up!). Whether it was the stringent rules of the debate or the moderator herself, I thought Ifill did a less than stellar job of keeping this thing on track and on topic. For me, Joe Biden was off his game and only regained composure in the second half of the debate. The most confusing though had to be the performance of Sarah Palin. I certainly have my bias but she seemed to be all over the map at all points and rarely answered anything other than her own self imposed questions with any specificity. Her expectations had been set at a bar so low that as she walked onto the stage she had cleared that bar.

In the end, I cannot possibly fathom where or how people can honestly come up with the notion that Palin is either qualified or knowledgable about the core issues facing this country. It reminded me of the student who had crammed the night before the final exam, barely passed the exam, and just as quickly emptied their had of the crammed information.

I notice that my good friend and right wing spin machine, Gary Gross, copied and pasted a list of "14 Lies" on his blog conveniently provided to him by the McCain campaign. Let's take a look:

I am not going to dispute all of these, because frankly, Biden did make some inaccurate assertions. Interesting, though, that Gross decided not to be honest enough to also include a list of Palin lies.

JOE BIDEN’S 14 LIES TONIGHT

1. TAX VOTE: Biden said McCain voted “the exact same way” as Obama to increase taxes on Americans earning just $42,000, but McCain DID NOT VOTE THAT WAY.

Given that this statement provides no context or hard evidence either way, it is nearly impossible to dispute this claim. That is the beauty of it...

What specific bill are we talking about? FactCheck.org seems to know the bill in question and calls the Palin claim that Obama voted to increase taxes on "families" earning just $42,000 FALSE. So here is the spin: Biden may have misspoke that McCain voted the same way but seems to leave out that they are lying in the first place about the original claim.

Palin repeated a false claim that Obama once voted in favor of higher taxes on “families” making as little as $42,000 a year. He did not. The budget bill in question called for an increase only on singles making that amount, but a family of four would not have been affected unless they made at least $90,000 a year.

Biden wrongly claimed that McCain “voted the exact same way” as Obama on the budget bill that contained an increase on singles making as little as $42,000 a year. McCain voted against it. Biden was referring to an amendment that didn't address taxes at that income level.

2. AHMEDINIJAD MEETING: Joe Biden lied when he said that Barack Obama never said that he would sit down unconditionally with Mahmoud Ahmedinijad of Iran. Barack Obama did say specifically, and Joe Biden attacked him for it.

This particular assertion is accurate but the question is, why isn't John McCain willing to do the diplomatic work necessary to deal with Ahmadinejad and others who are our enemies?

3. OFFSHORE OIL DRILLING: Biden said, “Drill we must.” But Biden has opposed offshore drilling and even compared offshore drilling to “raping” the Outer Continental Shelf.”

This assertion makes the assumption that Biden is referring to the outer continental shelf when he makes the statement "drill we must". We ALL know what happens when you ASS U & ME!

4. TROOP FUNDING: Joe Biden lied when he indicated that John McCain and Barack Obama voted the same way against funding the troops in the field. John McCain opposed a bill that included a timeline, that the President of the United States had already said he would veto regardless of it’s passage.

And Barack Obama opposed a bill that DID NOT include a timeline for withdrawal. McCain wants the two situations to be judged on two different merits, which is what Biden was trying to say even though he misstated the "voted" part. What Biden should have said is that the issue here is opposition or support of a withdrawal timeline and NOT an issue of opposition or support of funding the troops.

5. OPPOSING CLEAN COAL: Biden says he’s always been for clean coal, but he just told a voter that he is against clean coal and any new coal plants in America and has a record of voting against clean coal and coal in the U.S. Senate.

He has a record of voting against clean coal? FactCheck.org questions whether the voter exchange was taken out of context but they also make it clear that this assertion by the McCain campaign is false by defending Biden.

Whatever Biden meant or didn’t mean to say on the rope line, he has supported clean coal in the past. When the McCain camp used this one remark from Biden as the basis for a TV ad saying that Obama-Biden oppose clean coal, we said the claim was false. Obama’s position in favor of clean coal has been clear, and pushing for the technology has been part of his energy policy.


6. ALERNATIVE ENERGY VOTES: According to FactCheck.org, Biden is exaggerating and overstating John McCain’s record voting for alternative energy when he says he voted against it 23 times.

I am going to leave this one but it is amusing that the McCain campaign would first, use FactCheck.org for this one given that they have already disputed some of the items on this very list and second, that FactCheck.org makes it clear that while this is an exaggeration it is clear that McCain has not been a supporter of alternative energy. It certainly doesn't paint him as a champion of alternative energy:

Biden said four times that McCain had voted 20 times against funding alternative energy. However, in analyzing the Obama campaign's list of votes after the first presidential debate, we found the number was actually 11. In the other instances the Obama-Biden campaign cites, McCain voted not against alternative energy but against mandatory use of alternative energy, or he voted in favor of allowing exemptions from these mandates.
The point for the McCain Campaign here: "I am not as bad on alternative energy as my opponents make me out to be!"

7. HEALTH INSURANCE: Biden falsely said McCain will raise taxes on people’s health insurance coverage; they get a tax credit to offset any tax hike. Independent fact checkers have confirmed this attack is false.

I would love to see the "independent fact checkers" that are cited here. The only mention I have found is from the AP:

BIDEN: Warned that Republican presidential candidate John McCain's $5,000 tax credit to help families buy health coverage "will go straight to the insurance company."

THE FACTS: That's not surprising - the money is meant to pay for health insurance. The Obama campaign tried to capitalize on the candidates' health care exchange by issuing an ad Friday contending that the Republicans can't explain "the McCain health tax."

However, I did find this from FactCheck.org about the McCain health plan:

The McCain campaign hasn't released an estimate of how much the plan would cost, but independent experts contradict Palin's claim of a cost-free program.

The Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center estimates that McCain's plan, which at its peak would cover 5 million of the uninsured, would increase the deficit by $1.3 trillion over 10 years. Obama's plan, which would cover 34 million of the uninsured, would cost $1.6 trillion over that time period.


8. OIL TAXES: Biden falsely said Palin supported a windfall profits tax in Alaska; she reformed the state tax and revenue system, it’s not a windfall profits tax.

I am going to leave this one simply because I don't care whether you call it a reform or a windfall profits tax. It is clear that Palin made it so that oil companies in Alaska paid more in taxes. In fact, Politifact described it this way:

Palin was sworn in as governor on Dec. 4, 2006. Over the course of 2007, she fought to raise taxes on oil companies. Alaska gets about 85 percent of its state revenue from oil taxes, and as fuel prices skyrocketed, Palin complained the state wasn't getting its share of the windfall. She successfully pushed for a law that raised taxes on oil profits to 25 percent from 22.5, winning passage in the State Legislature in November 2007. The increase amounted to an estimated $1.6-billion annually more for the state.

9. AFGHANISTAN/GEN. MCKIERNAN COMMENTS: Biden said that top military commander in Iraq said the principles of the surge could not be applied to Afghanistan, but the commander of NATO’s International Security Assistance Force Gen. David D. McKiernan said that there were principles of the surge strategy, including working with tribes, that could be applied in Afghanistan.

This one is my absolute favorite! Does the McCain Campaign really want to bring this up given that Palin didn't actually mention General McKiernan but rather some guy named McClellan. Even better than that, Gary Gross called him McClellan in his previous analysis. More importantly than all of that is this from FactCheck.org:

Point Biden. To start, Palin got newly appointed Gen. David D. McKiernan's name wrong when she called him McClellan. And, more important, Gen. McKiernan clearly did say that surge principles would not work in Afghanistan.

10. REGULATION: Biden falsely said McCain weakened regulation — he actually called for more regulation on Fannie and Freddie.

This one too, is hilarious! They once again make the assumption that Biden was speaking strictly of Fannie and Freddie. Wasn't it John McCain who called himself fundamentally a deregulator? Unless McCain provides more context to this quote it remains "fundamentally" true.

11. IRAQ: When Joe Biden lied when he said that John McCain was “dead wrong on Iraq”, because Joe Biden shared the same vote to authorize the war and differed on the surge strategy where they John McCain has been proven right.

This one is just plain stupid. Why? This is an opinion expressed by Joe Biden and can be neither deemed true nor false. McCain and his Gross mouthpiece really are trying to pad this list.

12. TAX INCREASES: Biden said Americans earning less than $250,000 wouldn’t see higher taxes, but the Obama-Biden tax plan would raise taxes on individuals making $200,000 or more.

Hooray, let's play the semantics game. Question for those willing to believe this list: Doesn't this statement put out by McCain then debunk his own claim that Obama wants to raise taxes on middle income Americans? Did anybody even proofread these to make sure you weren't debunking your own claims?

13. BAILOUT: Biden said the economic rescue legislation matches the four principles that Obama laid out, but in reality it doesn’t meet two of the four principles that Obama outlined on Sept. 19, which were that it include an emergency economic stimulus package, and that it be “part of a globally coordinated effort with our partners in the G-20.”

Now we are going to play the quibble game... Sure, I'll give you this one because once again I say, WHO CARES and I also am not willing to put in the research to try debunk it!

14. REAGAN TAX RATES: Biden is wrong in saying that under Obama, Americans won’t pay any more in taxes then they did under Reagan.

I am going to leave this one as well just because I have lost the ambition to continue on with this foolish list.

On this list, there are FIVE places in which I would agree that Biden made some sort of misstep or misstatement. The other NINE are dubious claims with clear spin for the conservative masses who are more than willing to ignore the actual substance of the list and simply cite that Biden lied 14 times.
So, I am on my way to get the car washed today and I drive by a house with a John McCain for President yard sign. However, this particular sign read: "Another Democrat for McCain".

Next to that particular sign was a gigantic Steve Gottwalt sign.

To the folks that live at this particular residence, I call BULLSHIT! No self respecting Democrat who believed in liberal, progressive, or even blue dog principles would be supporting Steve Gottwalt. While John McCain may have a couple centrist positions, Gottwalt is a lap dog of the ultra right wing of the Republican Party. Either you haven't studied enough about the candidates you are supporting or you were never really a Democrat to begin with.