Showing posts with label Income-Inequality Gap. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Income-Inequality Gap. Show all posts
1:28 AM | Posted in , ,
A letter in the St. Cloud Times today "hopes" for our very own Representative Bachmann to stand up for the middle class and the poor when creating the stimulus package now floating through Congress. To that hope I can only apply the old adage that he can hope in one hand and (bleep) in the other and see which one gets filled first.

From the St. Cloud Times:

Published: January 27. 2008 12:30AM

As we watch a congressional "stimulus package" unfold, I hope Rep. Michele Bachmann and Sens. Norm Coleman and Amy Klobuchar will stand up for putting the benefits where they can do the most good: with middle- and lower-income Americans who need all the financial help they can get and who will spend the money in ways that will help employment.

People who work hard and yet do not earn enough to actually pay taxes should benefit, too.

Mr. Bradbury, you apparently haven't been paying attention because if you had you would have already been given the answer to the question of whether Bachmann would give financial help to middle and low income Americans. Aside from the obvious pride Bachmann feels about us "workingest" Minnesotans working two jobs, the stimulus she has decided to support (HR 4995) does nothing to stimulate working Americans. What it does is give additional tax breaks to corporations. Corporations that Bachmann hopes will then provide more jobs and this despite the fact that she acknowledges we are already working multiple jobs. I wonder if Bachmann realized that contradiction when deciding to hand out the cash to corporations?


And please, no more tax-breaks for the wealthy. Any suggestion that those irresponsible and, yes, bipartisan gifts to the very rich early in the Bush presidency have helped more than they have contributed to the slow but steady growth in our federal deficit is without merit.

Oops, Mr. Bradbury, perhaps you shouldn't click on that link or read the purpose of the Bachmann stimulus solution given that tax breaks for the wealthy is EXACTLY what Bachmann wants to do. That's not all! Bachmann has been saying all along that she wants to make those magical tax cuts permanent which have given us so much prosperity these many years. As income inequality becomes more severe with even the President acknowledging its severity, Michele Bachmann believes the solution is to allow those very people that hold upwards of 75% of the wealth to gain access to even more.

It takes a long time to build a genuine recession. It started when majority Republicans as well as Democrats gave up on policies of fair taxation and fostered an economic environment in which middle- and lower-class people have seen their earning power and wages fall behind the benefits experienced by those higher on the income scale.

I hope members of Congress will start taking the long view on their actions.

They must mandate genuine oversight of those agencies and authorities who should have been watching the growth of loans to people who simply couldn't afford and/or didn't understand their mortgages.

The loss of homes and equity and nest eggs, which has yet to reach its zenith, composes a great sadness in the lives of millions of people.

It should sadden and concern us all. Someone should have been paying attention. Someone should have spoken up long ago.

... Today, if we truly care about ... our nation, we should all be paying attention.

I applaud your efforts and your "hope" but it is best you don't look to Michele Bachmann for the solution to our economic woes. It was only recently that Michele even acknowledged the economy was anything less than recession proof. Rather than hold out for "hope" you should put your efforts into seeing Michele Bachmann ousted from the United States House of Representatives and that way you needn't (bleep) in your hand waiting for "hope".

Cross Posted on Dump Bachmann
7:11 PM | Posted in ,
Recently, in a post about the growing income-inequality gap, I wondered when I would be getting trickled on as a result of the Bush tax cuts that were supposed to lift everyone in the economy. Well, The Onion has answered my call. Apparently, in a short 26 years you and I will see somewhere in the neighborhood of $10 that, as we speak, is trickling down from on high.

Reaganomics Finally Trickles Down To Area Man

The Onion

Reaganomics Finally Trickles Down To Area Man

BANGOR, ME-"He may not have lived to see it, but I'm sure President Reagan is up in heaven smiling down on me," said the recipient of two crisp five-dollar bills.

��
5:04 PM | Posted in ,
In sad news, the Wall Street Journal reported that the top 1% of Americans took in a paltry 20% of the TOTAL income in 2005. Is it any wonder that Michele Bachmann is doing her very best to give much needed relief to this under served yet increasingly wealthy group? Certainly, if the ultra wealthy are reaping these kinds of rewards the rest of us should be seeing similar gains as 'trickle down' economics teaches us. Oops, it seems that while the wealthy accrue an increasing percentage of the wealth, the bottom 50% of us saw income drop to 12.8% (below 2000 levels) of TOTAL income. It seems as though we are being less trickled upon and more crapped upon!

It begs the question, When am I going to get 'trickled' on?

Income-Inequality Gap Widens

Boom in Financial Markets
Parallels Rise in Share
For Wealthiest Americans

Highlights:

The wealthiest 1% of Americans earned 21.2% of all income in 2005, according to new data from the Internal Revenue Service. That is up sharply from 19% in 2004, and surpasses the previous high of 20.8% set in 2000, at the peak of the previous bull market in stocks.
The bottom 50% earned 12.8% of all income, down from 13.4% in 2004 and a bit less than their 13% share in 2000.

The IRS data go back only to 1986, but academic research suggests the rich last had this high a share of total income in the 1920s.
The data highlight the political challenge facing Mr. Bush and the Republican contenders for president. They have sought to play up the strength of the economy since 2003 and low unemployment, and the role of Mr. Bush's tax cuts in both. But many Americans think the economy is in or near a recession. The IRS data show that the median tax filer's income -- half earn less than the median, half earn more -- fell 2% between 2000 and 2005 when adjusted for inflation, to $30,881. At the same time, the income level for the tax filer just inside the top 1% grew 3%, to $364,657.