Showing posts with label Steve Andrews. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Steve Andrews. Show all posts
8:26 PM | Posted in , ,
Some 10 months ago I traveled out to House District 16B to attend a house party for a DFL candidate by the name of Steve Andrews. The man I found there was both insightful and honest and wanting to run a campaign based upon the foundations of what makes Minnesota a great place to live.
As your representative, I pledge to you that I will work tirelessly to ensure that all of our children have the opportunity to succeed. It’s called protecting what we have.

Together we can rebuild this State we call home!

Together we can accomplish the great things that were once handed down to us by people like my parents and yours.

Together we can protect the investment and legacy that our forefathers worked so hard to hand down to us.
Sometimes, a candidate loses election not because of anything they have done wrong or because they are the lesser candidate. Sometimes, a candidate loses simply because the dynamics of their district set them up to lose. This is the case in the district of Steve Andrews.

NO Democrat could or will win in 16B unless a major shift occurs. This is the heart of evangelical Minnesota where people vote almost solely upon social issues and the Democratic Party is seen as Michele Bachmann would describe it, a bunch of anti-American baby killers who are hell bent on destroying their religion and their "way of life".

Andrews almost had a chance that few thought was possible with what looked like a three way race between Andrews, Mark Olson, and Mary Kiffmeyer. Unfortunately, it didn't work out that well and he was stuck in a two way race with a more well known figure who has impeccable kooky evangelical conservative ideals.

Other inside the campaign issues hurt the Andrews campaign as one of its greatest assets was essentially driven out of both the campaign and the party.

While I tried to help Mr. Andrews in a variety of ways, I have to be honest that I did not put in as much effort as I could have or probably should have. To Andrews I must apologize for those things I said I would do but didn't and those things I should have done but failed to make a priority.

Good luck, Steve, and keep in touch...
A few days ago I wondered aloud whether the virulent anti-Krueger crowd would connect the dots and also punish Mary Kiffmeyer who swept in to take the Olson seat in the Minnesota House of Representatives and then installed a crony to take the Minnesota Senate seat.

Olson supporters are mobilizing against Alison Krueger with an aggressive write-in campaign. Yet, in his old House District, the Kiffmeyer Campaign has not drawn the same ire from the Olson people. Shouldn't Olson and his minions go to the root of their problems which is Mary Kiffmeyer who pushed them out of the district and forced him into this new fight for the Senate?

Today that question appears to have been answered as a blogger from the district is spreading the word to not only write in Olson for the Senate seat but also for the House seat.

I am endorsing and supporting Mark Olson to be my write in candidate for both the 16 CD Senate Candidate but also for the 16b House of Rep. Candidate.

I will let Mark choose which position he wants!

I am suggesting that members of my district to do the same!

I refuse to have this Senate Victory Fund choose my representation in my own Backyard!

Mary Kiffmeyer and Alison Kreuger, you both should be ashamed of yourselves for selling out!

You are selling out me and your fellow Republicans!


The question remains, how much influence does this particular blogger have within the district and can he muster enough write in votes to take down both Krueger and Kiffmeyer? If he is able to muster a dual write in campaign, how much could that help my good friend, Steve Andrews, as he tries to become the DFL Representative from District 16B?
This election year is getting more and more interesting in Senate District 16. Over in House District 16B you have what is potentially a three way race that may split this very conservative district enough to hand the seat to moderate DFLer, Steve Andrews. I learned today from a relatively reliable source that Mark Olson WILL be running as an "independent" against Republican endorsed, Mary Kiffmeyer, and DFL endorsed, Steve Andrews.

To top things off, Betsy Wergin was recently appointed to the Public Utilities Commission by Tim Pawlenty opening the Senate seat for a special election tied in with the general election in November.

Will Mary Kiffmeyer get out of 16B and move over to the Senate race?

Will Mark Olson try for the Senate seat?

Tim Budig at the Hometown Source Political Pulse Blog is speculating that Olson may wait until the July 31st deadline and run for the State Senate seat being vacated by Wergin.

As of noon today (July 15) Rep. Mark Olson, R-Big Lake, has not filed for office. Olson is at the Capitol, holed up in his office at last check.

One question is whether Olson, who would face former secretary of state Mary Kiffmeyer if he elects to seek his old district seat, will do that or attempt to win a seat in the Minnesota Senate.

Also, it is interesting to note that a reporter saw Olson at the Capitol yesterday and asked him about filing for the 16B seat. I have to wonder what time that was at given that Olson was scheduled to be at an Education Minnesota candidate screening and called to cancel because of a "meeting".

As of noon today (July 14) Olson, who lost his district endorsement to former secretary of state Mary Kiffmeyer, hadn’t filed for office.

When a reporter saw Olson at a cash machine at the Capitol today and asked about his political plans, Olson refused to comment.

Pressed whether he had made up his mind one way or the other on running, Olson replied that he was “working at it.”

Olson’s office late last week indicated the lawmaker would release a press release tomorrow — last day of filing.



Will both of them, without the knowledge of the other, drop out of 16B and find themselves competing again at the Senate level?

Who will the DFL choose to run for the State Senate seat? I nominated former House District 16B candidate, Jim Huhtala, for the position but he promptly told me that he was no longer interested and preferred to do lawn maintenance (he has a really big lawn folks!) rather than run another election.

If Kiffmeyer abandons the 16B seat can Republicans, in good conscience, vote for a man convicted of assaulting his wife?

So, let's turn this into a prediction thread. Leave your predicitions in the comment section.
This election year is getting more and more interesting in Senate District 16. Over in House District 16B you have what is potentially a three way race that may split this very conservative district enough to hand the seat to moderate DFLer, Steve Andrews. I learned today from a relatively reliable source that Mark Olson WILL be running as an "independent" against Republican endorsed, Mary Kiffmeyer, and DFL endorsed, Steve Andrews.

To top things off, Betsy Wergin was recently appointed to the Public Utilities Commission by Tim Pawlenty opening the Senate seat for a special election tied in with the general election in November.

Will Mary Kiffmeyer get out of 16B and move over to the Senate race?

Will Mark Olson try for the Senate seat?

Will both of them, without the knowledge of the other, drop out of 16B and find themselves competing again at the Senate level?

Who will the DFL choose to run for the State Senate seat? I nominated former House District 16B candidate, Jim Huhtala, for the position but he promptly told me that he was no longer interested and preferred to do lawn maintenance (he has a really big lawn folks!) rather than run another election.

If Kiffmeyer abandons the 16B seat can Republicans, in good conscience, vote for a man convicted of assaulting his wife?

So, let's turn this into a prediction thread. Leave your predicitions in the comment section.
6:41 PM | Posted in , ,
I have been periodically sending questions off to a few Minnesota House candidates. One of those candidates is District 16B candidate, Steve Andrews. Last time around we covered questions about his positions on different education issues. For this round of questioning, I sent off some health care questions. Here is what Mr. Andrews had to say:

1. The rising cost of health care is a concern for many citizens. What do you see as the biggest concern in our current health care system?

The problems with our health care system vary depending on who you talk to. To the small business owners the problem is the rising cost which is greatly out-pacing inflation. My employer saw a large increase in her premiums this year and so she had to increase the amount I pay for my family coverage by 24%. If you're a Union worker you have seen your benefits decrease or your wages threatened to maintain your health coverage because your employer is feeling the pinch of out of control health care cost. Employees in general are worried about losing coverage should they become unemployed. If you're a health care provider you are frustrated by the bureaucracy and administrative cost that is required to collect payment from insurers. And if you're one of the 400,00 Minnesotans (80,000 kids alone) without health insurance, you're just one illness or injury away from financial ruin.


This past year alone, my health care rose roughly 19%. Apart from a one year blip in which our costs went down, we have seen increases each year of at least 10%. A colleague put it best when she explained that you take one step forward with contract negotiations and then take two steps backwards with the costs of health care.

2. What solutions do you have for bringing down the cost of health care?

The easiest thing we can do is cut back on the administrative cost by standardizing reimbursement requirements for health care providers. This will lower the cost of both insurance and health care. There are a lot of good and bad plans out there but one thing is for certain, we cannot afford to continue to ignore this problem.


3. Do you support some form of single payer health care in Minnesota? Why or why not?

If the current trends continue we may very well find ourselves in a position where single payer is the only option left. I am open to all suggestions except for doing nothing and ignoring the problem.


With all due respect to Mr. Andrews, I am going to have to call him on this non-answer. While it is certainly understandable, in the district he is running, to not show support for single payer health care but at the very least he ought to be taking a stand on something. If you are opposed to single payer, make it clear that is your stance and if you are in favor of single payer, it is time to work your tail off and convince those around you that it is the right solution to the problem.

4. How do your solutions differ from those of your opponent?

My opponents have fought for years to maintain the status quo; both of them have had government paid insurance available. That insurance is probably some of the best coverage out there, so they have no problems with the current system. In a few years Ms. Kiffmeyer will be covered by a single payer health care system run by the government called Medicare. Representative Olson has had access to taxpayer provided health insurance for 16 years now. Yet both will fight hard to make sure the rest of us make due with something less. We need better thinking on this subject than the two of them provide.


I had the opportunity to talk to Mr. Olson a few years ago when I was lobbying for a statewide health insurance pool and he talked about his health care. Actually, it was more of a rambling about how he had to go to Colorado for something or another and I stopped listening after he talked in more than one circle. As for Kiffmeyer, she and her front group, Minnesota Majority, got into some trouble over their racial purity remarks on health care.

On a side note, the poll for House District 16B is still open and I encourage anyone living in the district to take a few moments and voice their candidate choice (anonymously, of course).
4:45 PM | Posted in ,
The Steve Andrews Campaign filed their election papers today and put out the following press release:

BIG LAKE—Steve Andrews, the DFL-endorsed candidate in House District 16B, officially launched his campaign this week by filing election papers with the office of the Secretary of State.

A resident of Big Lake Township and father of two sons, Andrews said as state representative he’ll focus on working for Sherburne County residents, not playing the kind of political games “that really turn off voters of both parties.”

“I’ve been talking to people for months now—Democrats, Republicans, independents and none of the above,” Andrews said. “One thing that keeps coming up is the distrust in government, the lack of faith in the system. As state representative, I’m not going to worry about becoming a star with the crowd in St. Paul. I’m going to wake up, drive to the Capitol, work hard and come back home at the end of the day and listen to what people have to say.”

Reflecting on the current state of affairs at the Capitol, Andrews said he looks forward to ending the practice of “placing party loyalty ahead of doing what’s right.”

“I’m proud to be a Democrat, true,” Andrews said. “But I’m not going to let my party affiliation trump my core values and beliefs. I’m pro-life. I believe rural Minnesotans deserve the same from government as people who live in the Twin Cities. And I don’t believe we can simply tax our way out of every problem—we have to innovate, as well.”

In a well-received speech at the party convention in April, Andrews outlined his common-sense vision for the future:

Ending Massive Property Tax Hikes: “We are at the limit of what we can afford to pay in property taxes. This is particularly true for our seniors and others living on a fixed income. Simply shifting taxes to local government has been a failure and now it’s time to clean up the mess and bring about fair taxation.”
Building an Education System for the 21st Century: “(W)e must provide our children with the tools they need to compete … unfunded mandates and rollercoaster funding policies have taken their toll. It’s time to fix the problems with ‘No Child Left Behind’ or get rid of it!”
Effective Solutions to Local Traffic Problems: “(W)e have to make the hard decisions and spend (state funds) wisely on the most needed projects.”
Health Care for Children is a Moral Obligation: “We will not rest until all the citizens in our state have access to health care. We will find common ground because 80,000 children in our state without health care is inexcusable and immoral.”

The political system isn’t broken, Andrews said, it’s simply being misused right now.

“People are tired of the same old games, the same old distractions and the same old results,” Andrews said. “I think if we can stick to the basics at the Capitol we can really produce the kind of results Minnesotans expect and deserve.”

A native Minnesotan, Andrews graduated from St. John’s University with a degree in government. He is currently vice president of technology at Fintegra Financial Solutions. He and Mary also own and operate a retail food distributorship. Their sons, Oliver and Clarke, attend Pinewood Elementary School.

Mary Kiffmeyer, the Republican endorsed candidate has also filed paperwork to run for the District 16B seat. Notably absent, however, is the name of the man who currently holds the 16B seat. Mark Olson, who was convicted this year of assaulting his wife, could potentially turn this into a three way race. If Olson does enter the race, then the potential is there for Andrews to win in one of the most conservative districts in the state.

I sent off some health care questions to Andrews last week and received the answers this weekend. Those questions and answers will be posted soon.
��
Checking in with the Sherburne Citizen today, there is an LTE asking folks to consider El Tinklenberg for Congress as well as touting House District 16B candidate, Steve Andrews, for election this November.

Saturday, July 05, 2008

Letters To The Editor

To the Editor:

I became active again in the DFL following the caucuses this spring. The attendance at these events was unprecedented.

People realize that we need to change course and we cannot rely on our elected officials, or either political party, to accomplish this for us. Change will only happen when new people bring fresh approaches to an election process that has relied heavily on relentless negative advertising to destroy an opponent.

This new approach to campaigning has accounted for much of Barack Obama's appeal.

El Tinklenberg and Steve Andrews are two candidates vying for federal and state legislative positions who seem to get this. They are both moderate and respectful in their approaches.

El faces an extremely polarizing incumbent, Michelle Bachman whose radical agenda drew the attention of Karl Rove who anointed her to bring his scorched earth brand of politics to Central Minnesota. El is cool headed and respectful and unlikely to be baited by attacks.


Tinklenberg, who has been endorsed by both the Blue Dogs in Congress as well as the Independence Party here in Minnesota is racking up the moderate credentials while Michele Bachmann continues to swoon at the feet of the fringes of her own party. While she has technically voted against the majority of her party nearly 8% of the time, it is certainly NOT because she has been voting with the Democratic Party. Apart from a few instances of procedural votes with the Democrats and against the Republicans, Bachmann has chosen to side with the minority even in her own party.
These are but a handful of measures that Bachmann saw fit to vote NO on while the majorities of both her party and the party she reviles voted YES. Instead, she chooses to align herself with the likes of Eagle Forum and Phyllis Schlafly. Her divisive legislative record and relationship with extremists in her own party are proof enough of her lack of concern for anyone other than those with whom she agrees. In fact, this week Bachmann will abandon her constituents to cozy up to her friend Schlafly in Washington DC.

Steve, whose opponents are somewhat less divisive in their approaches, is running an upbeat and issues based campaign as well. Both of these men are decent, thoughtful and moderate candidates in the best traditions of Minnesota politics and they deserve your careful consideration.

Ron Thiessen.

Becker, Mn

I would have to respectfully disagree with Mr. Thiessen that the two opponents facing off against Steve Andrews are less divisive. Andrews, though, is every bit the moderate voice that would fit the area well. Having talked to him on numerous occassions, I can attest to the fact that he is uninterested in talking about the negatives of his opponents but is more inclined to talk about the goals he hopes to achieve in the state legislature. The biggest issue for me is and always has been education and Andrews is head and shoulders above his anti-education opponents:

Fair and adequate funding, early childhood education opportunities, parental involvement, and teachers committed to students all contribute to our prominence in education. Unfunded mandates eat away at school budgets resulting in larger class sizes which have caused us to slip in national rankings. Now more than ever we need political leadership, not partisanship, to help educated students. I will work for Minnesota students to ensure that their educational needs are met so they can reach their potential.
5:00 PM | Posted in , ,
House District 16B is a ways away from my home district but I have been interested in this contest ever since the arrival of Steve Andrews and an invitation from a friend to meet the candidate that could potentially turn one of the reddest districts in the state blue.

Mr. Andrews essentially blended answers to all three of my questions below into one statement. Below you will find the questions with his statement found in green.

What are the major issues facing education in the state of Minnesota and what are your plans to address those issues?

What, in your mind, is the role the legislature should play in educating our children? What role do educators play? What role do parents play?

Anything else you would like to add about education?

Fair and adequate funding, early childhood education opportunities, parental involvement, and teachers committed to students all contribute to our prominence in education. Unfunded mandates eat away at school budgets resulting in larger class sizes which has caused us to slip in national rankings. Now more than ever we need political leadership, not partisanship, to help educated students. I will work for Minnesota students to ensure that their educational needs are met so they can reach their potential.

Taxpayers will not tolerate wasteful spending in our schools and neither will I. Simply throwing money at a problem is not the answer but at the same time we must adequately fund education so our kids are prepared to compete in a world economy in the 21st century. Results of Minnesota’s educational investments are seen by the presence of world-class companies based here. I will work to make sure Minnesota is where business wants in the future because of our quality workforce.

We can provide both the funding schools need and demand accountability at the same time. The Minnesota Miracle of the 1970’s showed us that Republicans and Democrats could set aside differences and set a common goal of funding quality public education. When partisanship was set aside all Minnesotans won. Now it’s our turn to do the same. We can rebuild the miracle and drive Minnesota education to new heights. I will work tirelessly and across party lines to support Minnesota education.

Communities understand their own educational needs. Local control makes sure the community is an active partner and driving force behind our schools. Parents be involved every step of the way as partners and leaders in education. The more information parents have the better decisions they can make when teaming with educators in the classroom.

Funding needs to be fair. Kids in Sherburne County deserve the same educational opportunities as kids living in Edina and Bloomington. We must provide good education even in tough economic times. Simply shifting funding to local property taxpayers is not leadership. It’s the job of the legislature to ensure good public education. As your representative I’ll do my job and work for our kids and schools.

Unfunded mandates placed on our schools need to be eliminated or fairly funded. If the federal government requires a mandate it should fund it too. We have to either fix and fund or forget No Child Left Behind (NCLB).

Teachers, staff and school administrators have a job to do and they need to get fairly paid for doing those jobs well. Professional development opportunities keep raising the bar for educators. Let’s look at options that bring and retain the best teachers possible in classrooms.

Early childhood education gives us a measurable return on our investment and helps our kids hit the ground running as they enter grade school. Investments in early childhood give kids a sound foundation to build on throughout their academic years.

The role of higher education cannot be overstated. Today’s families are hit hard by tuition increases and students are carrying tremendous record high debt after graduating. I will work to slow tuition increases by partnering with higher education institutions for a common goal of help our students reach their potential.

The legislature’s job is to fund education fairly. Representative should gather the facts and listen to the needs of families, educators, students, and business leaders. Gathering the facts means setting aside partisanship, finding common ground, and working hard to solve problems. Many - if not most - of the best legislative solutions dealing with state problems in the past have been the result of good relationships between government and the citizens it serves. History does repeat itself and provide the framework for dealing with today’s challenges not just for education but for all public debate. That framework consists of trust, honest discussion, open-mindedness and getting the facts straight.

As the summer progresses, I hope to send off more questions to the Andrews Campaign on issues ranging from health care to transportation and lots of other issues in between. If you have any suggestions for questions or issues, then please leave your requests in the comments section.
With the end of a legislative session there begins an election campaign in Minnesota to see who will control the State House of Representatives. As of now there are 85 DFL members and 49 Republican members which, unlike the Minnesota Senate, is just short of a veto proof majority. Obviously, the Republican Party will be fighting hard to keep that from happening just as hard as we should be fighting to make sure that it does happen. Right now there are three districts right in this area that are difficult pick ups but have Democrats running in them with the potential to make it happen. All they need is for people to help!

Steve Andrews (District 16B):
In perhaps the most difficult district in the state for a DFLer to win, Steve Andrews has a unique opportunity to show the people of 16B that they no longer have to be represented by the divisive and destructive wing of the conservative movement. Mary Kiffmeyer may have won the Republican endorsement but in all likelihood, Mark Olson will run as a so called Independent Republican. With this situation there is the potential for these two ultra conservative candidates to split the heavy Republican vote leaving Mr. Andrews to sweep in to office with Democrats and truly independent voters. I am confident that if given this chance, Andrews can show the people of 16B that he can be an effective voice for them in the legislature.

Andrews, though, will need the support and foot work of every single person in his district. Having talked to Andrews and knowing that he is passionate about education and reforming the way we invest in education, I implore educators in the area to get in touch with Mr. Andrews and help him so that they can finally be represented by a friend of education rather than a representative bent on destroying public education.

Rob Jacobs (District 14A):
A little closer to home is Rob Jacobs running against Dan Severson. While Severson is prone to using wedge issues in order to gain support, Jacobs is not backing down from the fight. He is mounting a one man letter writing campaign focusing on bread and butter issues that will hopefully resonate with voters concerned with economic concerns.




Joanne Dorsher (District 15A):
I haven't had the opportunity to cover Mrs. Dorsher in any detail, but was able to meet and briefly wish her luck at the Senate District 15 Convention. Having worked on the St. Cloud School Board for 7 years, she offers a wealth of education experience that her opponent does not have. While some might label this a safe district for Steve Gottwalt, it should be noted that Tarryl Clark carried the district. Also, given the way that Gottwalt treats those people that disagree with him, Dorsher should be able to highlight her ability to work with even those people that aren't in 100% agreement. I am hoping, in the coming months to reach out to Mrs. Dorsher to find ways that this blog can help her get her message out to the voters in the area.


All of these candidates need our help given that they are all in challenging areas that will likely see only minimal support from the state DFL Party. So, it is incumbent upon us locally to find ways to assist them. Whether that help is leg work, financial, or even writing a letter to the editor it is time to mobilize and bring these three seats out of the divisive wilderness and in to a world of common sense leadership.
The Sherburne Citizen has an article about the Senate District 16 Convention and the endorsements of Steve Andrews for District 16B and Gail Kulick Jackson for District 16A. I have previously covered the endorsement here and my thoughts on Mr. Andrews here.

While I have yet to cover Gail Kulick Jackson, I did have the chance to speak with her when I was at the Steve Andrews House Party and found her to be both friendly and knowledgeable. Perhaps this time around she will be able to unseat one of the most anti-education former educators this state has ever seen.

The Kulick Jackson money quote:

During her turn at the podium, Jackson struck a John Travolta-like disco pose and told the convention that she had "a few moves of my own" that the Republicans had not seen yet. She said that the process of running for office has been "like climbing a mountain, and now I can see the top." She also told the delegates how events in her life had shaped her awareness of the need for "fairness and opportunity" to be available to all residents of Minnesota. A graduate of Hamline University and the U of M Law School, Jackson lives in Paige Township with her husband and son.

Andrews is precisely the moderate voice in the legislature that District 16B needs in order to gain any sense of relevance again. With Olson or Kiffmeyer, the district gets more of the same fringe leadership. Let us hope that the district finally recognizes this and chooses common sense.

The Andrews money quote:

Andrews told the delegates that Minnesotans are "tired of the partisan food fight" that has been going on in state government, and the process is in need of repair. "It's not working," he said, "and we all know it." A first-time candidate, Andrews lives in Big Lake Township with his wife Mary and their two sons. He is a vice-president of technology for a financial corporation, and operates a retail food distribution company along with his wife.



2:42 PM | Posted in ,
Congratulations to Steve Andrews, DFL candidate in House District 16B for getting the endorsement to run against Mary Kiffmeyer and Mark Olson this November. I had the pleasure of meeting Mr. Andrews a few months ago at an event he held in his home. He was gracious and friendly to everyone he met and left a wonderful impression on me as a man of principle and value that would both serve that district well and serve the people of Minnesota well.

Since that event, I have seen Mr. Andrews at a few events I have attended and covered. Each and every time he has been welcoming and friendly.

From the Press Release:

Andrews: 'Finding Common Ground Makes Us Stronger'

Andrews, who's making his first bid for state office, said as state representative he'll work to end the long-running "partisan food fight" at the Capitol.

"It's easy to listen to others when their ideas are the same as our own," he told delegates at Milaca Area High School. "It takes real work to listen to folks with another viewpoint. It takes leadership to bring both sides together for our common good."

In his convention speech, Andrews mapped out a positive agenda based on months of conversations with Democrats, Republicans and independents across the district:

  • Ending Massive Property Tax Hikes: "We are at the limit of what we can afford to pay in property taxes. This is particularly true for our seniors and others living on a fixed income. Simply shifting taxes to local government has been a failure and now it's time to clean up the mess and bring about fair-share taxation."
  • Building an Education System for the 21st Century: "(W)e must provide our children with the tools they need to compete … unfunded mandates and rollercoaster funding policies have taken their toll. It's time to fix the problems with "No Child Left Behind" or get rid of it!"
  • Effective Solutions to Local Traffic Problems: "(W)e have to make the hard decisions and spend (state funds) wisely on the most needed projects."
  • Health Care for Children is a Moral Obligation: "We will not rest until all the citizens in our state have access to health care. We will find common ground because 80,000 children in our state without health care is inexcusable and immoral."


Good Luck, Mr. Andrews!
��
10:13 PM | Posted in , ,
The Sherburne Citizen has an article about local caucus activities that took place on February 5th. In amongst the review of the evening (which appears to be a winner for the local DFL) was a snippet about the introduction of Steve Andrews to local residents.

Andrews, seeking the seat currently held by Mark Olson, says he is running on the issues of property tax relief, education, health care, transportation and growth. As a hunter and a fisherman, he said, he is interested in preserving natural resources.

"The state has dropped the property tax ball," Andrews said. "Shifting the burden from St. Paul to local government is not working. Schools need adequate set funding they can count on every year. Now education funding is a roller coaster. It's like managing the budget for your own home. You need to know what your income is going to be to be able to make good decisions."

Early childhood education provides a good return on the investment, Andrews said.

"I will support that. We need to spend smart dollars," he said. "I also believe in supporting higher education. College aid is gone or underfunded. Every dollar we spend on educating our young people is an investment in our future."

"Affordable healthcare is a critical need. Every family is just one catastrophic illness away from bankruptcy, Andrews said. "That is not acceptable."

Transportation needs, highlighted by the bridge collapse on 35W, are another are of major concern for Andrews.

"Nobody likes to spend money on these things but it is like maintenance on your house. You need to spend money to protect your investment. We need other forms of transportation too, like the Northstar commuter train.

"If my vision and your vision are compatible, with strong ideas and strong ideals, I ask you to stand by me tonight I will stand by you and work hard for you and do it with integrity," Andrews promised.


Steve Andrews has the potential and from the sound of things, the message, to unseat Mark Olson and provide common sense representation for the people of House District 16B.

In related news, there was also an article reviewing local Republican caucuses. After reading the article, I was intrigued by this passage:

Discussion was especially lively at the Becker City caucus, with a number of attendees expressing displeasure with sitting U.S. Senator Norm Coleman's recent voting record. One member of the audience drew applause when he noted that Coleman seemed to him "more liberal than conservative" in recent months and "I'm not sure I can support him." In his remarks during the caucus, Swanson noted that Coleman had earned the displeasure of the state party organization as well, saying that "the turnout tonight says that we, as grass-roots activists, want our party back." Other comments included references to state party chairman Ron Carey's endorsement of Gov. Huckabee prior to the caucuses, after having urged party members to refrain from endorsements until after the vote.

Immigration reform, opposition to global warming-related legislation and Sen. McCain's proposed "carbon tax" on fossil fuel usage were among the topics of resolutions put forward by the individual caucuses. The large turnout at the Becker Township caucus also discussed ongoing opposition to gay marriage and civil unions, and the role of religious organizations in politics.


First, are these people really still concerned about issues of gay marriage and civil unions over those of health care, education, or the economy? Really? Given that states such as Massachusetts have allowed gay marriage for upwards of 6 years and the state hasn't been smoten by the Lord, shouldn't we be worrying about issues THAT REALLY MATTER! I think we have established that gay marriage is not the harbinger of the second coming it has been made out to be by those who play the divisive politics game. Also, the role of religious organizations in politics? Oh to be a fly on the wall to hear what they meant by that cryptic remark.

Second, is anybody a little concerned about the fact that the discussion of displeasure completely left out the 800 pound gorilla in the room? Either these people chose to completely ignore the fact that their chosen representative in the State Legislature is a convicted abuser or the writer simply chose to not mention it. While it would be a shame if it was the latter, the former leaves one with the sense that the people calling themselves Republicans in 16B really ought to be deciding what value to crusade against. Can you really be a credible "values voter" and deny marriage to others while electing a man who defiles the very thing you purport to defend?
12:02 PM | Posted in ,
At the behest of a friend of mine in House District 16B, I traveled out to an event for DFL candidate Steve Andrews. The man I met on my arrival was both humble and passionate about serving the people of the district.

It was a fantastic event with candidates ranging from local House races to 6th District races to nearly all of the Senate candidates. Mr. Andrews made it a point throughout the evening to speak with nearly everyone in the room. I was impressed by his willingness to listen to my concerns for the state even though he knew full well that I would not be able to vote for him. I was impressed by the questions he asked in our discussions in order to dig deeper into the issues. I was impressed by his candor in not wanting his campaign to be about the inequities of the other guy but of the accomplishments and vision he possessed. Finally, I was impressed by his message of "protecting what we have".

Towards the end of the evening he gave a wonderful speech on this theme.

As your representative, I pledge to you that I will work tirelessly to ensure that all of our children have the opportunity to succeed. It’s called protecting what we have.

Together we can rebuild this State we call home!

Together we can accomplish the great things that were once handed down to us by people like my parents and yours.

Together we can protect the investment and legacy that our forefathers worked so hard to hand down to us.


I encourage anyone living in House District 16B to take a close look at Mr. Andrews because I, for one, will be helping out in any way that I am able. Good Luck Mr. Andrews!
��
4:22 PM | Posted in , ,
From the Sherburne County Citizen:

Saturday, November 17, 2007

Big Lake man files to run against Olson

By Gary W. Meyer
Editor

A Big Lake man this week announced his candidacy for the DFL party nomination to oppose Mark Olson for his Minnesota Legislature position in next November's general election.

Steve Andrews, 47, Big Lake Twp., will seek the DFL District 16B nomination, which if successful would lead to a campaign against Olson, who has announced his intention to run for re-election.

Olson has won election to the local House seat for seven terms. He was first elected in 1991.

Andrews in a prepared statement termed himself a "moderate and committed to effective investment of our tax dollars."

He and his wife of 15 years, Mary, own a Seattle Suttons Healthy Eating outlet in Maple Grove. He serves as vice president of technology at Fintegra Financial Solutions in Minneapolis.

He is a graduate of St. Johns University. The couple has two elementary-age sons.

The West Sherburne Tribune has an article with more quotes from Andrews:

Saturday, November 17, 2007

BL man seeking Olson's House seat


Steve Andrews announced his candidacy for election to the Minnesota House of Representatives. He is seeking the DFL nomination in District 16B.

"I'm an average person who holds higher than average expectations of the Legislature on behalf of the citizens it serves," Andrews said. "I'm your neighbor, I'm a moderate, and I'm committed to effective investment of our tax dollars."

"Over the next year I am going to speak a little and listen a lot to concerns, ideas and solutions that people offer. We are facing complex issues involving education, health care, the state's transportation infrastructure, and taxes. How are we going to allocate funds the most effectively, without waste? My focus and commitment to the people of 16B is genuine and my agenda will be set by the citizens I will represent at the Capitol," Andrews said.

Andrews has been active in various community organizations, including service on the Monticello Housing and Redevelopment Authority prior to moving to County. He is a graduate of St. John's University, Collegeville, with a Bachelor of Science degree in Government and Social Science and a secondary education minor.

He is employed by Fintegra Financial Solutions in Minneapolis as Vice President of Technology. He and his wife, Mary, are co-owners of a small business, Seattle Sutton's Healthy Eating of Maple Grove. The Andrews' have been married for 15 years and have two elementary age sons. They live in Big Lake.


*Hopefully, the people of 16B will come to their senses and vote Mark OUT! Incidentally, when did the 16B seat in the state legislature become the ownership of any one person? Whomever wrote this article really ought to remember that seats in government are owned by the people and NOT by those that sit in them.