7:00 PM | Posted in ,
Despite all the rhetoric over the past year from conservatives about returning to their roots of smaller government and fiscal responsibility, it appears as though they secretly still long for the pork. A story from the Washington Times (that liberal rag!) lays out the obvious hypocrisies:

The Senate's two biggest sponsors of this year's pet spending projects are Mr. Stevens of Alaska and Sen. Thad Cochran of Mississippi, both Republicans, according to preliminary reviews of fiscal 2008 spending bills by nonpartisan Taxpayers for Common Sense. Two of the House's three biggest claimants of earmarks also are Republicans: C.W. Bill Young of Florida and Jerry Lewis of California, the group found.

Their continued success at steering billions of taxpayer dollars to their constituents is all the more impressive — or arguably hypocritical — because President Bush and other prominent Republicans sharpened their criticisms of earmarks after Democrats took over the House and Senate majorities in January.

Given that these Republicans have been outraged by the "bloated" budgets of the Democratic majority, perhaps they could have sacrificed their 40% of the pork pie so that some of these other priorities (see SCHIP or the Iraq War) could have been more affordable.

Another bit of contention is the constant brow beating of the Democrats by this Republican President:

Congressional leaders "have not made enough progress" in curbing earmarks, Mr. Bush said. He said his budget director will "review options for dealing with the wasteful spending in the omnibus bill."

Democrats this year shed more light on the earmarking process and reduced its overall cost. Still, about 9,000 earmarks costing $7.4 billion are in the final spending measure.

Perhaps, before Bush blasts the Democratic Congress for improper spending, he will also chastise his own party for partaking in pork with every bit the vigor that Democrats partake. Also, he really might want to examine the previous six years in which he signed each and every pork laden spending bill that floated across his desk. It looks pretty petty when you begin to care about pork spending only when the people in charge are of the opposite party persuasion.

Finally, our very own Michele Bachmann delivered the weekly radio address for the Republicans and made this statement:

because Republican reforms brought more transparency to the budget, taxpayers can now see and scrutinize just how their hard to come by money is being spent, even when Democrats put their budgets together in the dead of night earlier this week.


So, either Michele Bachmann doesn't understand the difference between Republican and Democrat or she is lying because any person with a modem and a search engine could show you that it was a bill sponsored by a Democrat which provided the transparency with which we now see the big spenders in the Republican Party.
��