With yet another election cycle upon us, it is time once again to choose a candidate for the 6th District that can compete and win against one of the more infamous conservative representatives anywhere in the entire country today.

If the rumors I am currently hearing are true, we will find ourselves with a three way race between perpetual candidate Elwyn Tinklenberg, Dr. Maureen Reed, and current Assistant Senate Majority Leader Tarryl Clark. So, who would you choose?

With Tinklenberg you have a candidate who received national attention and loads of national money after Bachmann opened her mouth and denounced Obama and "certain members" of Congress as Anti-American. Couple that with what appears to be the addition of a big name campaign manager which Tink hopes will seal the deal and you have an organization which could be tough to beat for the DFL endorsement. Yet, for all of his national attention I am not hearing a lot of local excitement about another Tinklenberg v. Bachmann race. Are the rank and file interested in a different direction?

In Dr. Maureen Reed you have a moderate former Independence Party candidate who has been bringing in staggering amounts of campaign cash since she announced her candidacy. With all of that cash, can Reed overcome the advantages currently held by the Tinklenberg Campaign? Given the support in the DFL community for health care reform which includes a public option, how will the Reed noncommittal stance play throughout the caucuses?

Finally, there is the potential entry of Senator Tarryl Clark. At this point it is all hearsay but my anonymous sources tell me that at a recent Minneapolis Regional Labor Federation meeting she was asked and said that she "hadn't announced" but this source also said it was "pretty clear". Clark has proven that she can compete and win having been elected twice. More importantly, she won handily in the more conservative half of her district whose current representative is the ultra conservative Steve Gottwalt. With all of these electoral advantages, could Clark overcome the current money disadvantage she would have coming into the race?

At this point in the process I am not putting my endorsement on ANY candidate (I made that mistake before). So, 6th District DFLers, what are you looking for in 2010 that will defeat Michele Bachmann? Have you decided on a candidate? If yes, what makes your choice the answer to flipping the district blue?

Comments (33)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
Login or signup now to comment.
Draft Clark's avatar

Draft Clark · 820 weeks ago

I live in the district and wondering if anyone has considered a Draft Clark movement to get her to run.
Reply
I'd like to say Clark at this point although I remain skeptical that Bachmann can be beaten in the 6th as it stands now. Clark's entry into the 6th race would neutralize Tinklenberg's labor advantage as I doubt labor will put a lot of money into another endorsement race that could be close (ala 2006 when labor spent money on Tink, then ended up spending a lot on Wetterling as well).

Although Reed is rakin in the big bucks, I don't think they have made a strong connection to the voters as of yet...we're waiting to see more from her other than gaudy fundraising numbers!

With Governor candidates gaining key staffers and such...the longer Clark waits, the more I'm inclined to think she won't do anything.
Reply
1 reply · active 819 weeks ago
I think what we need to consider is which candidate is going to have the most appeal to moderates. El had his shot, and I think it is clear that he was unable to bridge the gap and build a coalition to beat Bachmann. Tarryl has shown that she can win in her district, but I don't think that translates to the 6th as a whole. Her legislative record will hurt her district wide because she has consistently voted with the party, and that isn't going to play well in a district that is more conservative as a whole. Dr. Reed's uniquely positioned as knowledgeable about an issue--healthcare--that will most likely be front and center during the campaign, and I feel her appeal to both Independence voters and DFLers gives her the unique ability to build a coalition that can beat Bachmann.
Reply
2 replies · active 820 weeks ago
Maureen Reed is really the ONLY candidate to beat Michele. There is NO question. We need a candidate who isn't going to caught in a past legislative history AND is going to work extremely hard to win. Reed is the ONLY one who fits that description!
Reply
2 replies · active 820 weeks ago
Maureen Reed has the most relevant experience, the moderate credentials that can win the conservative leaning district (and not just the DFL nomination), and clearly the fund raising gusto to get the job done. It's a clear choice.
Reply
1 reply · active 820 weeks ago
I agree with Mischa and Rae. I believe Maureen Reed will be the candidate who can get the job done and will dedicate herself to her constituents. She gets my vote!
Reply
I agree with Rae. It is clear to me that Maureen has what it takes. She is unencumbered by a legislative history, and certainly does work hard. I was really impressed by the $230,000 she raised in the first two months of the campaign. While I know there is plenty of interest in DFL circles at attempting to beat Michelle, the number is pretty impressive.

Her work with the University and in health care prove her command over the issues and allows her to approach the run with some serious professional expertise on two very important topics to Minnesotans and America more generally.

I also agree with Paul that El, while a strong candidate was unable to gain the traction he needed against Bachmann prior to her late missteps. I won't fault him for having $$ left over because of the volume of late donations coming in and the limited availability of remaining TV time; however, it is quite clear to me that it is time for a different approach.

I hope Maureen gets the nod as I think that she can give Bachmann a real run for her money both literally and figuratively!
Reply
It's between Reed and Clark for me. I think either has a chance at beating Bachmann; Tarryl because of her name recognition and ability to win in a conservative area in the 6th and Reed because of her leadership experience in the health care field. Both would bury Bachmann in a debate. That being said, Bachmann won't debate either of them because she knows she'd look like a fool. She will avoid all debates just as she did during the 2008 election cycle.
Reply
Reed seems like the most solid of the options here; I think Paul up the thread hit on the most important reason. Reed is the one with the best shot in this district--a quite conservative one. El didn't really impress anyone last time around, and it would be pretty foolish to recycle an uninspiring candidate.
Reply
I fully support Dr. Maureen Reed. Every endeavor she begins she goes at with a gusto. I don't think there's anything gaudy about fund-raising prowess. $230,000 is a staggering and impressive sum for a first time congressional candidate in the first quarter of her candidacy.

Maureen has often stated that her foci in the 6th district will be on job creation, dealing with foreclosures in the district and helping reform health care.

For me, I don't think I could find a better candidate.

Also, it's a little odd that the post isn't tagged under Maureen Reed though it's tagged under El and Clark.
Reply
1 reply · active 820 weeks ago
Where do the candidates stand on the public option for health care? That would make a good story since this is the big issue of our time.
Reply
As an HMO executive, Maureen Reed knows that preventing overutilization by plan enrollees is the key to controlling health care costs. She'll be the voice of common sense and promote health care reform that respects the contributions the managed care sector is making to controlling health care costs. Now is NOT the time for radical government-run healh care!

By joining Peter Hutchinson's campaign as his running mate, she proved her political courage by standing up to the anti-managed care rantings of Mike Hatch . While some will claim that this helped re-elect Tim Pawlwnty, preventing Hatch and his DFL cronies from taking over the state was a far greater service.

In a conservative district like the Sixth, it's important that Democrats forget about candidates who pander to their public policy wish lists and put forward those who have the kinds of connections to the executuve and professional class that can amass the resources that can win campaigns.
Reply
4 replies · active 819 weeks ago
taxpaying liberal's avatar

taxpaying liberal · 820 weeks ago

It’s great to see that Reeds facebook challenge to come to this site and vote for her worked.
It’s also great to see so many people thoughtfully articulating Reeds positions which are something Reed has yet to do.

Sailor indicates that Reed is against the public option for health care reform. I’m curious as to what his source is for that. Is that something Reed has told him or written about?

I just don’t see another so called moderate as winning against Bachmann and even if one does what does it get you? Her first statement was that she is a blue dog, Elwyn is a blue dog, Janet Roberts was a blue dog. Why should a democrat like me vote or work to get a blue dog elected?

El’s got a record, Clark has a record, Reed needs one.

If Clark is in she wins the endorsement.
Reply
2 replies · active 820 weeks ago
Very interesting. I'll admit the results surprises me a little.
Reply
LITLOC Fan's avatar

LITLOC Fan · 820 weeks ago

I've talked with Reed and I'm concerned that she's a one trick pony - she can talk health care but is articulate on very little else. She has some real potential, but needs to bone up on most issues. The last candidate we had that was also flashy but uninformed on many issues was Patty Wetterling - and that didn't work out so well.
Reply
1 reply · active 819 weeks ago

Comments by